[ Back | Home ]
[Cite as Kendall v. State, 118 Tenn. 156, 101
S.W. 189, 121 Am. St. Rep. 994, 11 Ann. Cas. 1104 (1907).]
KENDALL v. STATE.
(Supreme Court of Tennessee. March 23, 1907.)
Shannon's Code, § 6641, providing: "It
shall not be lawful for any person to carry publicly or privately any dirk,
razor concealed about his person, sword cane, * * * belt or pocket
pistol, * * * or any kind of pistol, except the army or navy pistol,
usually used in warfare, which shall be carried openly in the hand"--is violated
by a hack driver carrying a pistol under the driver seat of his hack.
Error to Criminal Court, Davidson County; W. M.
J.A. Kendall was convicted of carrying a pistol, and brings error.
W.C. Cherry, for plaintiff in error. Assistant Attorney General Faw,
for the State.
SANSOM, Special Judge. Plaintiff in error was
indicted in the criminal court for Davidson county for carrying a pistol
unlawfully. He was tried before the judge without a jury, and found guilty, and
a fine assessed of $50 and costs against him. His motion for a new trial having
been overruled, he has appealed to this court.
The facts are very simple, and consist of a short statement by a
single witness, from which it appears that plaintiff in error was a hack driver,
and that on the 20th of September, 1905, in Nashville, Davidson county, Tenn.,
he became involved in a difficulty with one Perry Cotton, who, with a large
stick, attacked him, and either struck or struck at him several times with the
stick; plaintiff in error being at the time seated on the driver's seat of the
hack. While Cotton was so striking or striking at him with his stick, plaintiff
in error arose from the seat, lifted up the top thereof, and, reaching into a
box or compartment under it, drew forth a pistol which he had previously placed
there, and with this pistol fired one shot at Cotton, his assailant, who
thereupon ran, and plaintiff in error then replaced the pistol in the box or
compartment under the seat from which he had drawn it. These are the entire
facts as disclosed by the record.
The insistence is that, under the facts stated, plaintiff in error is
not guilty of the offense with which he is charged and of which he had been
convicted, and the judgment should therefore be reversed, and the case
dismissed. The presentment is predicated on section 6641 of
Shannon's Code, which reads as follows:
"It shall not be lawful for any person to carry publicly or
privately any dirk, razor concealed about his person, sword cane, loaded cane,
slungshot or brass knucks, Spanish stiletto, belt or pocket pistol or
revolver, or any kind of pistol, except the army or navy pistol, usually used
in warfare, which shall be carried openly in the hand."
The offense against the law under this enactment is the carrying of
any of the forbidden weapons with the intent of going armed. The law may be
violated just as fully and completely by the carrying of the weapon in his
handbag as in his pocket. It is the carrying with the purpose of going armed
that is the offense, and not the concealment about the person, with the single
exception of the razor. This must be concealed about the person in order to
constitute a violation of the terms of the statute for its carrying. It is the
practice of going armed that is purposed to be corrected and prohibited by this
salutary legislation, a practice the lawmaking branch of government purposed and
intended in the passage of this act to stop as far as possible, and which
laudable purpose the courts of the state should uphold and sustain by a fair and
impartial, but full and complete, administration of the law.
It has been held that the carrying of a navy pistol in a scabbard
hung to the saddle while riding along a public road is a violation of this
statute. Barton v. State, 7 Baxt. 105. Likewise that the
carrying of a pistol in a sack in the hand is within the statute, if so carried
with the intent to go armed. Robinson v. State, 3 Shan. Cas. 60. It is within
the statute, and indictable, to carry any kind of a pistol (except an army or
navy pistol, openly in the hand) in any way, whether concealed about the person,
or openly in the hand, or in a handbag, or in a sack, or in the box or
compartment beneath the seat of a vehicle being used, or otherwise, for purposes
of going armed, where the weapon is being so carried as that it is readily
accessible and available for use in the carrying out of purposes either
offensive or defensive. The idea seems to obtain that the weapon must be
concealed about the person in order to constitute a violation of the statute,
but such is not the case, except in respect of the razor.
There is no error in the judgment of the lower court; and it is
affirmed, with costs.