The State of Unclassified and Commercial Technology
Capable of Some Electronic Mind Control Effects
Eleanor White, P.Eng.
April 4, 2000

http://www.raven1.net/uncom.htm ..or.. http://www.bestnet.org/~raven1/uncom.htm

To help the reader appreciate the importance of this matter...
"We need a program of psychosurgery and political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.
"The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective.
"Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain."

Dr. Jose Delgado (MKULTRA experimenter who demonstrated a radio- controlled bull on CNN in 1985)
Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School
Congressional Record No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974

Monkeys in restraint, wires coming out of top of skull, left image "normal", right image with electric current being fed into the monkey's brain - note pupil sizes and clenched teeth! These images portray Dr. Delgado's ruthless disregard for life, pain, and suffering!




===========================================================================

CONTENTS



This document is organized so that a narrative article appears at the top,

followed by appendices.



- BLACK = NARRATIVE ARTICLE

- BLUE = APPENDICES



I.    LIMITATIONS.......................................................  3

II.   INTRODUCTION......................................................  3

III.  MIND CONTROL EFFECTS..............................................  4

IV.   MAJOR TECHNOLOGY CLASSES..........................................  9

V.    PULSED MICROWAVE.................................................. 12

VI.   ULTRASOUND AND VOICE-FM........................................... 15

VII.  THROUGH-WALL RADAR................................................ 19

VIII. THOUGHT READING................................................... 21

IX.   IMPLANTS ......................................................... 23

X.    CONCLUSION........................................................ 25

XI.   APPENDICES........................................................ 27

PM1.....THE LIDA MACHINE................................................ 28

PM2.....DR. ALLAN FREY'S PAPER.......................................... 32

PM3.....NASA ARTICLE.................................................... 43

PM4.....SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES/KOHN'S PROJECTS................ 46

PM5.....BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION (OF EM SIGNALS)........................ 48

PM6.....DR. DON R. JUSTESEN'S REPORT: 1974 VOICE TO SKULL SUCCESS....... 52

PM7.....U.S. GOVT DOCUMENT RE: RUSSIAN MIND CONTROL..................... 54

PM8.....OAK RIDGE LABS AND OTHER BULLETINS...............................58

US1.....SILENT SOUND, BRITISH ITV & NEXUS MAGAZINE...................... 64

US2.....U/SONIC MIND CONTROL COMMON, UNCLASSIFIED, MENSA EDITOR FINDS... 76

US3.....U/SONIC U.S. ARMY WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT................... 87

US4.....SILENT HYPNOSIS, VOICE-FM COMMERCIAL METHOD..................... 88

US5....."ACOUSTIC SPOTLIGHT", CAN TARGET ONE PERSON IN CROWD............ 92

TWR1....THE LADS DEVICE................................................ 100

TWR2....THE RADAR FLASHLIGHT........................................... 102

TWR3....MILLIVISION THRU-CLOTHING/WALL RADAR........................... 103

TWR4....GROUND [**OR HOME/APT WALL**] PENETRATING RADAR................ 104

TR1.....COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE THOUGHT-READING DEVICES................. 108

TR2.....IMPLANTED RATS CAN CONTROL DEVICES WITH THOUGHT................ 112

TR3.....THOUGHT READING BY RADIO SIGNAL................................ 114

TR4.....ELECTRONICS SEES WHAT A CAT SEES............................... 117

TR5.....MIND SWITCH - THINK APPLIANCES ON, OFF, OR ADJUST.............. 120

IMP1....PROMOTION OF HUMAN IMPLANTATION BY NIH......................... 123

IMP2....ITALIAN DOCTOR REPORTS HUMAN IMPLANTATION...................... 126

IMP3....IMPLANT TRANSMITS PHYSIO- AND PSYCHO- PARAMETERS BY RADIO...... 127

IMP4....DR JOSE DELGADO'S "STIMOCEIVER"/HUMAN IMPLANT EXPERIMENTS...... 130

IMP5....UNCLASSIFIED SATELLITE TRACKING HUMAN IMPLANT SYSTEM........... 134

PS......POSTSCRIPT..................................................... 136



PRINT FROM separate pages for unbroken sections and images
** BE SURE "IMAGES" ARE ON TO ALLOW PRINTING OF IMAGES **
=========================================================================== I. LIMITATIONS The author acknowledges that this article falls short of a rigorous academic paper. This is explained by the fact that all involuntary neuro-electromagnetic experimentees are kept in a sort of "barely alive" condition, with significant health problems, and either unable to work or just barely able to hold a job with limited earning potential. Furthermore, since the perpetrators constantly work to prevent the public from knowing anything about electronic mind control, evidence is obtainable with great difficulty, and often the only evidence is of lower quality than would be accepted for a scientific treatise. In short, everything in this article represents a struggle against immense odds. We ask readers to understand this and hope that those who are not under electronic attack and surveillance will try through independent channels to find better quality proof. Up to Contents =========================================================================== II. INTRODUCTION Electronic mind control technology had it's start in the 1950s, as an obscure branch of the CIA's MKULTRA project group. Just as organized crime is not stopped by hearings and court cases, neither did this originally obscure branch of MKULTRA activity, when the institutional/ drug/child abuse phases were exposed by the U.S. Senate's Church- Inouye hearings in the late 1970s. No criminal proceedings followed, and only two civil law suits (Orlikow and Bonacci) have succeeded. This assembly of unclassified and commercial literature is to show investigators and concerned citizens that in spite of the tightest possible information blackout imposed in the early 1970s, enough of the classified mind control technology has leaked out to show that significant classified accomplishments are overwhelmingly likely, and in need of disclosure, here at the end of the 20th century. It is hoped that government and media, who have shied away from this topic for decades, preferring the warm fuzzy feelings that "this can't be true", will read about the unclassified and commercial devices and understand the implications of continued turning the other way. Up to Contents =========================================================================== III. MIND CONTROL EFFECTS Since government-backed electronic mind control is classified at the highest levels in all technologically capapble governments, the description of effects is taken from the personal experiences of over 300 known involuntary experimentees. The experimentees without exception report that once the "testing" begins, the classified exper- iment specification apparently requires that the "testing" be continued for life. Many are young seniors, some in their 70s and 80s. Some have children and the children are often subjected to the same "testing" as their parent(s). The effects pattern: This article is about unclassified/commercial technologies which can produce some of the effects of the classified equipment, not testimonials, but this much has become clear over time: - All "testing" consists of unique, carefully engineered-unprovable events to produce psychological stress in the victim. There are no events which do not fit that apparent purpose. - In every series of stress event type, ONE introductory event of very high energy/effect is staged. The obvious purpose is to be certain the victim KNOWS this is external harassment, and not just "bad luck". From that time forward, the experimenters appear to apply "Pavlovian training" so that they can get the victim to "jump" (or react in some way) to the same effect at a tiny fraction of the initial "introductory" event. - This type of testing started during the Cold War, and shows every characteristic of being for military and intelligence psychological warfare purposes. - This type of testing all points to CONTROL of the test subject. Endlessly repeated words generated inescapably within the skull are just one hypnosis-like experience. - Given that CONTROL is the likely ultimate purpose, INVOLUNTARY test subjects become a necessity. Thus, the phenomenon of people apparently being chosen at random for this "work". - Given a requirement for INVOLUNTARY test subjects, the ONLY group with the necessary funds and legal powers is GOVERNMENT. Private contractors are no doubt the main perpetrators to keep the "work" well covered, but without secret complicity of GOVERNMENT, this expensive, extensive, and illegal atrocity simply could not happen. The effect types categorized: Here is a list of most of the common effects. It is not exhaustive, but is intended to show the reader how the perpetrators' pallette of stress effects is broken down. Indent levels are used to show categories and sub-categories: 1. Invasive At-a-Distance Body Effects (including mind) a. Sleep deprivation and fatigue i. Silent but instantaneous application of "electronic caffeine" signal, forces awake and keeps awake ii. Loud noise from neighbours, usually synchronized to attempts to fall asleep iii.Precision-to-the-second "allowed sleep" and "forced awakening"; far too precise and repeated to be natural iv. Daytime "fatigue attacks", can force the victim to sleep and/or weaken the muscles to the point of collapse b. Audible Voice to Skull (V2S) i. Delivered by apparent at a distance radio signal ii. Made to appear as emanating from thin air iii.Voices or sound effects only the victim can hear c. Inaudible Voice to Skull (Silent Sound) i. Delivered by apparent at a distance radio signal; manifested by sudden urges to do something/go somewhere you would not otherwise want to; silent (ultrasonic) hypnosis presumed ii. Programming hypnotic "triggers" - i.e. specific phrases or other cues which cause specific involuntary actions d. Violent muscle triggering (flailing of limbs) i. Leg or arm jerks to violently force awake and keep awake ii. Whole body jerks, as if body had been hit by large jolt of electricity iii.Violent shaking of body; seemingly as if on a vibrating surface but where surface is in reality not vibrating e. Precision manipulation of body parts (slow, specific purpose) i. Manipulation of hands, forced to synchronize with closed-eyes but FULLY AWAKE vision of previous day; very powerful and coercive, not a dream ii. Slow bending almost 90 degrees BACKWARDS of one toe at a time or one finger at a time iii.Direct at-a-distance control of breathing and vocal cords; including involuntary speech iv. Spot blanking of memory, long and short term f. Reading said-silently-to-self thoughts i. Engineered skits where your thoughts are spoken to you by strangers on street or events requiring knowledge of what you were thinking ii. Real time reading subvocalized words, as while the victim reads a book, and BROADCASTING those words to nearby people who form an amazed audience around the victim g. Direct application of pain to body parts i. Hot-needles-deep-in-flesh sensation ii. Electric shocks (no wires whatsoever applied) iii.Powerful and unquenchable itching, often applied precisely when victim attempts to do something to expose this "work" iv. "Artificial fever", sudden, no illness present v. Sudden racing heartbeat, relaxed situation h. Surveillance and tracking i. Thru wall radar and rapping under your feet as you move about your apartment, on ceiling of apartment below ii. Thru wall radar used to monitor starting and stopping of your urination - water below turned on and off in sync with your urine stream iii.Loud, raucous artificial bird calls everywhere the victim goes, even into the wilderness 2. Invasive Physical Effects at a Distance, non-body a. Stoppage of power to appliances (temporary, breaker ON) b. Manipulation of appliance settings c. Temporary failures that "fix themselves" d. Flinging of objects, including non-metallic e. Precision manipulation of switches and controls f. Forced, obviously premature failure of appliance or parts 3. External Stress-Generating "Skits" a. Participation of strangers, neighbours, and in some cases close friends and family members in harassment i. Rudeness for no cause ii. Tradesmen always have "problems", block your car, etc. iii.Purchases delayed, spoiled, or lost at a high rate iv. Unusually loud music, noise, far beyond normal b. Break-ins/sabotage at home i. Shredding of clothing ii. Destruction of furniture iii.Petty theft iv. Engineered failures of utilities c. Sabotage at work i. Repetitive damage to furniture ii. Deletion/corruption of computer files iii.Planting viruses which could not have come from your computer usage pattern iv. Delivered goods delayed, spoiled, or lost at a high rate v. Spreading of rumors, sabotage to your working reputation vi. Direct sabotage and theft of completed work; tradesmen often involved and showing obvious pleasure

Illustration of the bodily effects
Up to Contents =========================================================================== IV. MAJOR TECHNOLOGY CLASSES These technology classes are for the UNclassified and commercial equipment which can emulate the "real" classified mind control equipment. Effect section 2, "Invasive Physical Effects at-a-Distance", clearly establishes the existence of remote precision manipulation of objects which is far beyond the capabilities of unclassified and commercial equipment at the time of writing. REMOTE PHYSICAL MANIPULATION is not covered in this article, but the reader should know that both NASA and IEEE have noted successes in creating very small antigravity effects (which are not due to simple magnetism.) TRANSMISSION METHODS FOR NEURO-EFFECTIVE SIGNALS: - pulsed microwave (i.e. like radar signals) - ultrasound and voice-FM (transmitted through the air) While transmission of speech, dating from the early 1970s, was the first use of pulsed microwave, neuro-effective signals can now cause many other nerve groups to become remotely actuated. At time of writing, that technology appears to be classified. PAVLOVIAN HYPNOTIC TRIGGERS: A [Pavlovian] hypnotic trigger is a phrase or any other sensory cue which the victim is programmed to involuntarily act on in a certain way. The 50s-70s MKULTRA survivors can still be triggered from programming done decades ago. A name "manchurian candidate", from a novel by John Marks, is used to describe a person who carries Pavlovian triggers. One of the main goals of the institutional/drug/child abuse phases of the CIA MKULTRA atrocities (1950's through 1970's) was to implant triggers using a "twilight state" (half-conscious) medication and tape recorded hypnosis. The ultimate goal was to have the acting out of Pavlovian triggers erased from the victim's memory. Using one of the two transmission methods above, these triggers are now planted using either of the above two transmission methods, but with the words moved up just above (or near the top of) the audible frequency range. The result is that hypnotic triggers are planted without the subject being aware. This technology was used in the Gulf War and has a name: "Silent Sound" THROUGH-WALL SURVEILLANCE METHODS: So-called "millimeter wave" scanning. This method uses the very top end of the microwave radio signal spectrum just below infra-red. To view small objects or people clearly, the highest frequency that will penetrate non-conductive or poorly- conductive walls is used. Millimeter wave scanning radar can be used in two modes: - passive (no signal radiated, uses background radiation already in the area to be scanned, totally UNdetectable) - active (low power millimeter wave "flashlight" attached to the scanner just as a conventional light mounted on a camcorder), or, the use of archaeological ground penetrating radar THOUGHT READING: Thought reading can be classed as a "through wall surveillance" technology. Thought reading, in the unclassified/commercial realm, can be broken down as follows: - thru-skull microwave reading - magnetic skull-proximity reading BRAIN ENTRAINMENT: The reverse of biofeedback. Those low frequency electrical brain rhythms which are characteristics of various moods and states of sleep can not only be read out using biofeedback equipment or EEG machines, but using radio, sound, contact electrodes, or flashing lights, the moods and sleep states can be generated or at least encouraged using brain entrainment devices. Brain entrainment signals cannot carry voice, which is a much higher frequency range. Brain entrainment can, however, be used to "set up" a target to make him/her more susceptible to hypnosis. These major technology classes can produce some of the observed mind control effects, FROM HIDING AND UNDETECTABLY, with the exception of remote physical manipulation. IMPLANTATION is sometimes used to assist the above technologies but with current devices, implants are no longer required. Diagram showing the overall method, based entirely on unclassified 1974 technology, of how SILENT hypnosis may be transmitted to a target without the target's being aware. This technique is probably the most insidious, because it allows months and years of programming and Pavlovian trigger-setting, while the target cannot resist.
Up to Contents =========================================================================== V. PULSED MICROWAVE Pulsed microwave voice-to-skull (or other-sound-to-skull) transmission was discovered during World War II by radar technicians who found they could hear the buzz of the train of pulses being transmitted by radar equipment they were working on. This phenomenon has been studied extensively by Dr. Allan Frey, whose work has been published in a number of reference books. What Dr. Frey found was that single pulses of microwave could be heard by some people as "pops" or "clicks", while a train of uniform pulses could be heard as a buzz, without benefit of any type of receiver. Dr. Frey also found that a wide range of frequencies, as low as 125 MHz (well below microwave) worked for some combination of pulse power and pulse width. Detailed unclassified studies mapped out those frequencies and pulse characteristics which are optimum for generation of "microwave hearing". Very significantly, when discussing electronic mind control, is the fact that the PEAK PULSE POWER required is modest - something like 0.3 watts per square centimeter of skull surface, and this power level is only applied for a very small percentage of each pulse's cycle time. 0.3 watts/sq cm is about what you get under a 250 watt heat lamp at a distance of one meter. It is not a lot of power. When you take into account that the pulse train is OFF (no signal) for most of each cycle, the average power is so low as to be nearly undetectable. Frequencies that act as voice-to-skull carriers are not single freq- uencies, as, for example TV or cell phone channels are. Each sensitive frequency is actually a range or "band" of frequencies. A technology used to reduce both interference and detection is called "spread spectrum". Spread spectrum signals have the carrier frequency "hop" around within a specified band. Unless a receiver "knows" the hop schedule in advance, there is virtually no chance of receiving or detecting a coherent readable signal. Spectrum analyzers, used for detection, are receivers with a screen. A spread spectrum signal received on a spectrum analyzer appears as just more "static" or noise. My organization was delighted to find the actual method of the first successful UNclassified voice to skull experiment in 1974, by Dr. Joseph C. Sharp, then at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Dr. Sharp's basic method is shown in Appendix PM6, below. A Frey- type audible pulse was transmitted every time the voice waveform passed down through the zero axis, a technique easily duplicated by ham radio operators who build their own equipment. A pattern seems to be repeated where research which could be used for mind control starts working, the UNclassified researchers lose funding, and in some cases their notes have been confiscated, and no further information on that research track is heard in the unclassified press. Pulsed microwave voice-to-skull research is one such track.

Illustration showing the principle behind pulsed microwave voice-to-skull
Appended articles: PM1 http://www.raven1.net/lida.htm, photo and description of the Korean War LIDA machine, a radio frequency BRAIN ENTRAINMENT device developed by Soviet Russia and used in the Korean War on allied prisoners of war. BRAIN ENTRAINMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE RADIO FREQUENCY SECTION BECAUSE THE MOST INSIDIOUS METHOD OF BRAIN ENTRAINMENT IS SILENTLY, USING RADIO SIGNALS. PM2 http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm, Human Auditory System Response To Modulated Electromagnetic Energy, Allan H. Frey, General Electric Advanced Electronics Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York PM3 http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm, NASA technical report abstract stating that speech-to-skull is feasible PM4 http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm, DOD/EPA small business initiative (SBIR) project to study the UNclassified use of voice-to- skull technology for military uses. (The recipient, Science and Engin- eering Associates, Albuquerque NM, would not provide me details on the telephone) PM5 http://www.raven1.net/bioamp.htm, Excerpts, Proceedings of Joint Symposium on Interactions of Electromagnetic Waves with Biological Systems, 22nd General Assembly of the International Union of Radio Science, Aug 25 - Sep 2, 1987, Tel Aviv, Israel SHOWS BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION OF EM SIGNALS, pointing to relative ease with which neuro-electromagnetic signals can trigger effects PM6 http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm, Excerpt, Dr. Don R. Justesen, neuropsychological researcher, describes Dr. Joseph C. Sharp's successful transmission of WORDS via a pulse-rate- modulated microwave transmitter of the Frey type. PM7 http://www.raven1.net/russ.htm, FOIA article circulated among U.S. agencies describing the Russian TV program "Man and Law", which gives a glimpse into the Russian mind control efforts. (Dr. Igor Smirnov, a major player, was used as a consultant to the FBI at the Waco Branch Davidian standoff.) Up to Contents =========================================================================== VI. ULTRASOUND AND VOICE-FM Ultrasound is vibration of the air, a liquid, or a solid, above the upper limit of human hearing which is roughly 15,000 Hz in adults. Voice-FM uses a tone at or near that upper limit, and the speaker's voice VARIES the frequency slightly. Either a "tinnitus-like sound" or nothing is heard by the target. Ultrasound/voice-FM can be transmitted in these ways: - directly through the air using "air type transducers" - directly to the brain using a modulated microwave pulse train - through the air by piggybacking an ultrasound message on top of commercial radio or television The use of commercial radio or television requires that the input signal at the transmitter be relatively powerful, since radio and TV receivers are not designed to pass on ultrasound messages. However, the average radio and TV receiver does not simply stop ultrasound, rather, the ability to pass ultrasound messages "rolls off", i.e. degrades, as the frequency is increased. Today's radios and TVs can carry enough ultrasound messaging to be "heard" by the human brain (though not the ear) to be effective in conveying hypnosis. This was proven by the U.S. military forces in the Gulf War. Ultrasound's (and voice-FM's) main advantage in mind control work is that it can carry VERBAL hypnosis, more potent than simple biorhythm entrain- ment. The brain CAN "hear" and understand this "inaudible voice", while the ear cannot. Once you can convey hypnotic suggestion which cannot be consciously heard, you have eliminated a major barrier to the subject's acceptance of the words being transmitted. In previous decades, "subliminal advertising" using voice and images at normal frequencies were "time sliced" into an apparently normal radio or TV broadcast. This apparently did not work well, and now voice-FM "subliminal learning tapes" commercially available have superseded the time slice method.

Illustration showing the operation of "silent sound" with the human hearing system, using near-ultrasound, FREQUENCY MODULATED voice
One method for projecting either audible voice or voice-FM over long distances, virtually undectable if line of sight, is the "acoustic heterodyne" or "HyperSonic Sound" system, patented by American Technologies Corporation, San Diego CA, http://www.atcsd.com

Illustration showing the principle of an ultrasound projection system capable of true ventriloquism at a distance, by American Technologies Corporation (licensor), Akai Japan (licensee)
Appended articles: US1 http://www.raven1.net/silsoun2.htm, ITV Silent Sound report with comments by Judy Wall, Editor, Resonance, newsletter of MENSA's bioelectromagnetic special interest group US2 http://www.raven1.net/commsolo.htm, an article by Judy Wall outlining instances of UNclassified, openly-admitted-to, electronic mind control operations by government agencies. US3 http://www.raven1.net/armyparw.htm, an SBIR (small business initiative contract) which clearly shows intent to use ultrasound as an anti-personnel weapon, including one-man portability and with power to kill US4 http://www.raven1.net/ssnz.htm, a commercial New Zealand company, Altered States Ltd., sells tapes which perform "suggestions" (i.e. hypnosis but not called such) using the Lowery patent voice-FM method, to hypnotize without the subject being aware. This is a key feature of neuro-electromagnetic involuntary experiments. US5 http://www.raven1.net/acouspot.htm, a page originally from the MIT Media Lab's acoustic engineer, Joseph Pompeii. Describes a similar technique under commercial and military development (American Techno- logies Corp., San Diego) under the trade name "Hypersonic Sound". Shows that sound can be focussed to the extent of targetting just one person in a crowd, acoustically, using ultrasound. Up to Contents =========================================================================== VII. THROUGH-WALL RADAR When "millimeter wave" microwave signals are received, the waves are so small that they can display a two-dimensional outline of an object. Lower frequency radar can only show a "blip" which indicates an object's presence or motion, but not it's outline. A millimeter wave dish acts as a camera lens to focus incoming millimeter wave signals on to a plate with a two-dimensional array of elements sensitive to millimeter wave frequencies, in exactly the same way a camera focusses light on to a piece of film. Each of the sensitive elements is scanned in a definite order, just as with a TV camera and screen, and a picture showing the outline of an object is formed. If no signal is sent out by the scanner, it is called "passive" millimeter wave radar. If the subject is illuminated by a separate source of millimeter wave signals, it is an "active" scanner. Since passive systems can penetrate clothing and non-conductive walls UNDETECTABLY, it is obvious that with just a small millimeter wave "flashlight", non-conductive walls can be scanned through and still very little detectable signal is present. Millimeter wave through-clothing, through-luggage is currently in use at airports. In addition to mind control experimental observation, millimeter wave scanners are ideal for stalkers and voyeurs, since the subject is portrayed in the nude. Millimeter wave scanners can be purchased from Millivision Corp., Northampton MA, info at http://www.millivision.com Appended articles: TWR1 http://www.raven1.net/lads.htm, LADS, Life Assessment Detector System, a product of VSE Corporation, can scan through more than a hundred feet of non-conductive or poorly-conductive material to detect a beating human heart TWR2 http://www.raven1.net/nij_p44.htm, Prototype version of the "radar flashlight", which is a more portable version of the LADS system above. Can also be used to illuminate a subject for use with a Millivision thru-clothing/thru-nonconductive wall scanner TWR3 http://www.raven1.net/millitec.htm, October 1995 blurb from Popular Mechanics, with photos showing hidden guns used for demo purposes (Millitech sold the rights to Millivision) TWR4 http://www.raven1.net/ptscradr.htm, March 22 text taken from Patriot Scientific Corporation's web site, their ground-penetrating radar section. Patriot's GPR overcomes the limitation of the Millivision passive radar, i.e. inability to penetrate partially conductive walls. Up to Contents =========================================================================== VIII. THOUGHT READING "Thought reading" appears to be one of the EASIER components of electronic mind control, given that commercial and unclassified thought reading devices are available and being actively developed. Thought reading is an enhanced version of computer speech recognition, with EEG waves being substituted for sound waves. The easiest "thought" reading is actually remote picking up of the electro- magnetic activity of the speech-control muscles. When we "say words to ourselves, silently", or, read a book, we can actually FEEL the slight sensations of those words in our vocal muscles - all that is absent is the passage of air. Coordinated speech signals are relatively strong and relatively consistent. The other kind of "thought reading", i.e. "MINING" someone's brain for information from a distance is SPECULATIVE. We targetted individuals have no way to verify that is happening, however, we do know that we are "fed" hypnotic signals to force consistent "neutral" content (but of different character than prior to becoming test subjects,) DREAMS. These forced, neutral content ("bland" content) dreams occur every single night and may represent the experimenters' efforts to have our experiences portray themselves in such dreams, in effect, MINING our experiences. Again, this is SPECULATION, but it seems very logical. Appendix TR4, referenced below, confirms the ability of current unclassified technology to actually see what a living animal sees, electronically. It is therefore extremely likely that these forced dreams can be displayed on the experimenters' screens in an adjacent apartment or adjacent house, (which are made obvious to the involuntary experimentee.) Finally, among the 300 known neuro-electromagnetic experimentees, we often have strangers either tell us what we are thinking, say they can pick up our broadcast thoughts, or tell us about events inside our homes at times when they could not have seen from the outside. BUGS are not used, and they have been searched for. Appended articles: TR1 http://www.raven1.net/thotuncl.htm, Commercially available thought-reading devices, both implant-style and non-implant TR2 http://www.raven1.net/ratrobot.htm, Implanted rats can control devices with their thoughts TR3 http://www.raven1.net/ebrain.htm, from the July 1973 issue of Popular Electronics, a system to read EEG signals (the stuff of which thought reading is made) at a distance by passing a radio signal through the human head and analyzing the passed-through signal. TR4 http://www.raven1.net/elecvisn.htm, an article describing electronically reading a cat's brain waves and constructing a real-time image on screen from the EEG traces TR5 http://www.raven1.net/m_switch.htm, the text from a site describing a mind-controlled "switch", which can not only turn appliances on or off, but also adjust controls like volume. Up to Contents =========================================================================== IX. IMPLANTS Electronic implants are actually one of the older forms of electronic mind control technology. Implants can either receive instructions via radio signals, passing them to the brain, or, can be interrogated via external radio signals to read brain activity at a distance. Many of the about 300 known involuntary neuro-electromagnetic experimentees do not have implants, but have an aggressive and thorough regimen of mind control effects anyway. IMPLANTS ARE STILL SIGNIFICANT, though, for these reasons: 1. Their use, since World War II and continuing to the present day, associated with MKULTRA atrocities, is a crystal clear indication that a MOTIVE POOL of unethical researchers has existed through the late 1970s. The same people, none jailed, are still working, by and large. The reader can see that the existence of the same motive pool is overwhelmingly likely, given that no social changes have occurred which would prevent that. 2. The fact that to date (autumn 1999) no victim who has had implants removed has ever been able to get custody of the removed implant shows that research programmes using implants are still quite active and obviously quite important to someone. See http://www.morethanconquerors.simplenet.com/MCF/, the Mind Control Forum for details on involuntary experimentees' implantation and removal experiences. 3. The use of implants shows that, in the field of involuntary human experimentation, not every perpetrator group has access to the most sophisticated (implant-less) technology. Since implants for beneficial purposes are actively being promoted by NIH, it is obvious they will not disappear any time soon. Appended articles: IMP1 http://www.raven1.net/centneur.htm, an article showing that human implantation is being done and even encouraged by the U.S. NIH (National Institutes of Health). While this public information is for the public good, it is a small step to move from publicly known and VOLUNTARY implantation to CONCEALED implantation for INvoluntary and criminal purposes. IMP2 http://www.raven1.net/italydoc.htm, a testimonial by an Italian psychiatrist who has been assisting involuntary experimentees; this doctor began by assisting [Satanic or other] ritual abuse victims. Apparently involuntary brain implantation is alive and well in Italy, why not elsewhere? IMP3 http://www.raven1.net/telectro.htm, a project abstract by AF, awarded to perform unclassified research and development of human implants which can read both physio- and PSYCHO- parameters. IMP4 http://www.raven1.net/stimocvr.htm, an excerpt describing human implantation for purposes of two-way communication with the brain by way of implants and FM VHF radio. Blows away any doubts that human implantation has not been done, and even more, that the U.S. military are involved. IMP5 http://www.raven1.net/sattrack.htm, describes an unclassified human implant satellite tracking system, ostensibly for benevolent use. (No method for avoiding unethical uses is described.) Applied Digital Solutions, Inc., Palm Beach, Florida. Up to Contents =========================================================================== X. CONCLUSION Conclusion? While the documentary evidence in this report does not exactly "prove" we are being targetted by intelligence/defence contractors using classified electronic weapons, it certainly eliminates the argument that such devices are impossible, don't exist, or that government has "no interest" in them, or that the "were tried years ago but didn't work". Add in the experiences of victims of the Tuskegee untreated syphilis exper- iments, the feeding of radioactive food to uninformed U.S. citizens, and the atrocities perpetrated under the institutional/drug/child abuse phases of the CIA's MKULTRA programmes, and you have more than enough grounds to petition for an independent, open investigation. No doubt there were citizens of ancient Pompeii who argued that Vesuvius could not possibly erupt in their lifetimes. Faced with all the evidence, no honest government can afford to take the risk that electronic mind control activity may be happening, controlled from their own "back rooms". Eleanor White If any doubts as to the importance of this issue remain, please see below what the U.S. NSA (National Security Agency) says would be the result of releasing information on electronic mind control:

Up to Contents =========================================================================== XI. APPENDICES UP TO THIS PAGE, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN A NARRATIVE AUTHORED BY ELEANOR WHITE. THE APPENDICES ARE A COLLECTION OF THE BEST QUALITY FACTUAL MATERIAL FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES OUTSIDE THE INVOLUNTARY ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPERIMENTEE GROUP. THIS MATERIAL MAY BE INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED FROM REFERENCES PROVIDED. Up to Contents --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PM1 ... THE LIDA MACHINE Associated Press (Exact date not shown on copy but tests took place 1982/83) Loma Linda (Veterans Hospital research unit) San Bernardino County A Soviet device that bombards brains with low-frequency [Eleanor White's note: More likely radio frequency carrier which is modulated or pulsed at brain-entrainment rates] radio waves may be a replacement for tranquilizers and their unwanted side effects, says a researcher, but it's use on humans poses ethical and political questions. The machine, known as the LIDA, is on loan to the Jerry L. Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital through a medical exchange program between the Soviet Union and the United States. Hospital researchers have found in changes behaviour in animals. "It looks as though instead of taking a valium when you want to relax yourself it would be possible to achieve a similar result, probably in a safer way, by the use of a radio field that will relax you" said Dr. Ross Adey, chief of research at the hospital. [Missing one line on the photocopy] ... manual shows it being used on a human in a clinical setting, Adey said. The manual says it is a "distant pulse treating apparatus" for psychological problems, including sleeplessness, hyper- tension and neurotic disturbances. The device has not been approved for use with humans in this country, although the Russians have done so since at least 1960, Adey Said. Low frequency radio waves simulate the brain's own electromagnetic current and produce a trance-like state. Adey said he put a cat in a box and turned on the LIDA. "Within a matter of two or three minutes it is sitting there very quietly ... it stays almost as though it were transfixed" he said. Tho hospital's experiment with the machine has been underway for three months and should be completed within a year, Adey said. Eleanor White's comments (Dr. Byrd's statement follows): 1. Heavy "fatigue attacks" are a very common experience among involuntary neuro-electromagnetic experimentees. The LIDA device could, right out of the box, be used as a fatigue attack weapon, FROM HIDING, thru non- or semi-conductive walls. 2. If the LIDA machine is tuned for tranquilizing effect, then it might also be tuned for "force awake" and other effects too. This device is a psychotronic weapon, AS IS. A TV documentary stated the Russian medical establishment considers this 1950s device obsolete. (Wonder what has taken it's place?) Below is a statement from Dr. Eldon Byrd, U.S. psychotronic researcher who funded Dr. Adey's work with the LIDA machine: "The LIDA machine was made in the 1950's by the Soviets. The CIA purchased one through a Canadian front for Dr. Ross Adey, but didn't give him any funds to evaluate it. "I provided those funds from my project in 1981, and he determined that the LIDA would put rabbits into a stupor at a distance and make cats go into REM. "The Soviets included a picture with the device that showed an entire auditorium full of people asleep with the LIDA on the podium. The LIDA put out an electric field, a magnetic field, light, heat, and sound (of course light and heat are electromagnetic waves, but at a much higher frequency than the low frequencies of the electric and magnetic fields mentioned above). "The purported purpose of the LIDA was for medical treatments; however, the North Koreans used it as a brain washing device during the Korean War. The big question is: what did they do with the technology? It could have been improved and/or made smaller. It is unlikely that they abandoned something that worked. "Direct communication with Ross Adey: While he was testing the LIDA 4, an electrician was walking by and asked him where he got the "North Korean brain washing machine". Ross told him that is was a Russian medical device. "The guy said he had been brain-washed by a device like that when he was in a POW camp. They placed the vertical plates alongside his head and read questions and answers to him. He said he felt like he was in a dream. Later when the Red Cross came and asked questions, he responded with what had been read to him while under the influence of the device. He said he seemed to have no control over the answers. "The LIDA is PATENTED IN THE US. Why? They are not sold in the US--the only one I know that exists is the one that was at Loma Linda Medical Center where Adey used to work. Eldon" ................................................................. Involuntary neuro-experimentation activist Cheryl Welsh, Davis CA, sent in this clipping from an article by Dr. Ross Adey but without complete bibliographic references: "Soviet investigators have also developed a therapeutic device utilizing low frequency square wave modulation of a radiofrequency field. This instrument known as the Lida was developed by L. Rabichev and his colleagues in Soviet Armenia, and is designed for "the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic disorders, such as neuroses, psychoses, insomnia, hypertension, stammering, bronchia asthma, and asthenic and reactive disturbances". It is covered by U.S. Patent # 3,773,049. In addition to the pulsed RF field, the device also delivers pulsed light, pulsed sound, and pulsed heat. Each stimulus train can be independently adjusted in intensity and frequency. The radiofrequency field has a nominal carrier frequency of 40 MHz and a maximum output of approximately 40 Watts. The E- field is applied to the patient on the sides of the neck through two disc electrodes approximately 10 cm in diameter. The electrodes are located at a distance of 2-4 cm from the skin. [Eleanor White's comment: The fact that Dr. Ross Adey mentioned an "audience" being put to sleep by the LIDA suggests that the "E-field" electrodes may not play an essential role. The radio signal appears to be the primary cause of the sleep/trance effect.] Optimal repetition frequencies are said to lie in the range from 40 to 80 pulses per minute. Pulse duration is typically 0.2 sec. In an 8 year trial period, the instrument was tested on 740 patients, including adults and children. Postivive therapeutic effects were claimed in more..." Up to Contents --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PM2 - FREY'S PAPER

Human Auditory System Response To Modulated Electromagnetic Energy

ALLAN H. FREY

General Electric Advanced Electronics Center Cornell University Ithaca, New York



TRANSCRIPTION, Courtesy of MindNet Archives, Mike Coyle

posted at http://www.morethanconquerors.simplenet.com/MCF/



Frey, Allan H., Human Auditory system response to modulated

electromagnetic energy. J. Appl. Physiol. 17(4): 689-692.  1962.



(*) Asterisks indicate unreadable characters in the original copy.



NOTE:  In 1962, frequencies were expressed as kiloCYCLES, 

megaCYCLES, etc., with abbreviations being kc, mc



--The intent of this paper is to bring a new phenomena to the

attention of physiologists.  Using extremely low average power

densities of electromagnetic energy, the perception of sounds was

induced in normal and deaf humans.  The effect was induced several

hundred feet from the antenna the instant the transmitter was turned

on, and is a function of carrier frequency and modulation. Attempts

were made to match the sounds induced by electromagnetic energy and

acoustic energy.  



The closest match occurred when the acoustic amplifier was driven by

the rf transmitter's modulator. Peak power density is a critical

factor and, with acoustic noise of approximately 80 db, a peak power

density of approximately 275 mw / rf is needed to induce the

perception at carrier frequencies 125 mc and 1,310 mc.  The average

power density can be at rf as low as 400 _u_w/cm2.  The evidence for

the various positive sites of the electromagnetic energy sensor are

discussed and locations peripheral to the cochlea are ruled out.



Received for publication 29 September 1961.



A significant amount of research has been conducted with the effects

of radio-frequency (rf) energy on organisms (electro- magnetic energy

between 1 kc and ** Gc). Typically, this work has been concerned with

determining damage resulting from body temperature increase.  The

average power densities used have been on the order of 0.1-t w/cm2

used over many minutes to several hours.



In contrast, using average power densities measured in microwatts per

square centimeter, we have found that ****r effects which are

transient, can be induced with rf energy.  Further, these effects

occur the instant the transmitter is turned on.  With appropriate

modulation, the perception of different sounds can be induced in

physically deaf, as well as normal, in human subjects at a distance

of inches up to thousands of feet from the transmitter.  With

somewhat different transmission parameters, you can induce the

perception of severe buffeting of the head, without such apparent

vestibular symptoms as dizziness or nausea.  Changing transmitter

parameters down, one can induce a "pins-and-needles" sensation.



Experimental work with these phenomena may yield information on

auditory system functioning and, more generally, in the nervous

system function.  For example, this energy could possibly be used as

a tool to explore nervous system coding, possibly using Neider and

Neff's procedures (1), and for stimulating the nervous system without

the damage caused by electrodes.



Since most of our data have been obtained of the "rf sound" and only

the visual system has previously been shown to respond to

electromagnetic energy, this paper will be concerned only with the

auditory effects data.  As a further restriction, only data from

human subjects will be reported, since only this data can be

discussed meaningfully at the present time.  The long series of

studies we performed to ascertain that we were dealing with a

biological significant phenomena (rather than broadcasts from sources

such as loose fillings in the teeth) are summarized in another paper

(2), which also reports on the measuring instruments used in this

work.



The intent of this paper is to bring this new phenomenon to the

attention of physiologists.  The data reported are intended to

suggest numerous lines of experimentation and indicate necessary

experimental controls.



Since we are dealing with a significant phenomenon, we decided to

explore the effects of a wide range of transmitter parameters to

build up the body of knowledge which would allow us to generate

hypotheses and determine what experimental controls would be

necessary.  Thus, the numbers given are conservative; they should not

be considered precise, since the transmitters were never located in

ideal laboratory environments.  Within the limits of our

measurements, the orientation of the subject in the rf field was of

little consequence.



Most of the transmitters used to date in the experimentation have

been pulse modulated with no information placed on the signal.  The

rf sound has been described as being a buzz, clicking, hiss, or

knocking, depending on several transmitter parameters, i.e., pulse

width and pulse-repetition rate (PRF).  The apparent source of these

sounds is localized by the subjects as being within, or immediately

behind the head.  The sound always seems to come from within or

immediately behind the head no matter how the subjects twists or

rotates in the rf field.



Our early experimentation, preformed using transmitters with very

short square pulses and high pulse-repetition rates, seemed to

indicate that we were dealing with harmonics of the PRF.  However,

our later work has indicated that this is not the case; rather, the

rf sound appears to be incidental modulation envelope on each pulse,

as shown in Fig 1.



Some difficulty was experienced when the subjects tried to match the

rf sound to ordinary audio.  They reported that it was not possible

to satisfactorily match the rf sound to a sine wave or to white

noise.  An audio amplifier was connected to a variable bypass filter

and pulsed by the transmitter pulsing mechanism.  The subjects, when

allowed to control the filter, reported a fairly satisfactory match.

The subjects were fairly well satisfied with all frequencies below

5-kc audio were eliminated and the high- frequency audio was extended

as much as possible.  There was, however, always a demand for more

high-frequency components.  Since our tweeter has a rather good

high-frequency response, it is possible that we have shown an

analogue of visual phenomenon in which people see farther into the

ultraviolet range when the lenses is eliminated from the eye.  In

other words, this may be a demonstration that the mechanical

transmission system of the ossicles cannot respond to as high a

frequency as the rest of the auditory system.  Since the rf bypasses

the ossicle system and the audio given the subject for matching does

not, this may explain the dissatisfaction of our subjects in the

matching.



FIG. 1. Oscilloscope representation of transmitter output over             

        time (pulse-modulated).                                            

                                                                           

                 TRANSMITTER ELECTRONIC NOISE                              

                       |--(INCIDENTAL MODULATION)                          

                       |                                                   

                      \/                                                   

                   :.:.:.:             :.:.:.:                             

                   |     |             |     |                             

                   |     |             |     |                             

                   |     |             |     |                             

                 ---     ---------------     -----------                   

                  ON     OFF          ON     OFF                           

                                                                           

                                                                           

FIG. 2. Audiogram of deaf subject (otosclerosis) who had a "normal"        

        rf sound threshold.                                                

                                                                           

          -10|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|                      

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

            0|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| A = RIGHT BONE       

             |    |    A    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

             |----|----B----A--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| B = LEFT BONE        

             |    |    |  B |  A  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

  LOSS(db) 20|----|----|----B--B--AB-B--B--B--AB-|--| C = LEFT AIR         

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  A  |  |  |  |                      

             |----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| D = RIGHT AIR        

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  C                      

           40|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--C--|                      

             |    |    C C  C  |  |  |  |  |  C  |  |                      

             |----C----|----D--|--C--C--C--|--D--D--D                      

             |    |    D    |  D  |  |  D  |  |  |  |                      

           60|----D----|----|--|--D--|--|--|--|--|--|                      

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

             |----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|                      

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

           80|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|                      

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

             |----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|                      

             |    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                      

          100|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|                      

                 125  250  500   1000  2000  4000  8000                    

                        FREQUENCY (cps)                                    

                                                                           

                                                                           

TABLE 1. Transmitter parameters                                            

                                                                           

Trans-   Frequency,    Wave-     Pulse Width,  Pulses Sec.   Duty Cy.      

mitter      mc       length, cm    _u_sec                                  

                                                                           

  A       1,310        22.9           6           244         .0015        

  B       2,982        10.4           1           400         .0004        

  C         425        70.6         125            27         .0038        

  D         425        70.6         250            27         .007         

  E         425        70.6         500            27         .014         

  F         425        70.6        1000            27         .028         

  G         425        70.6        2000            27         .056         

  H       8,900         3.4           2.5         400         .001         

                                                                           

                                                                           

FIG. 3. Attenuation of ambient sound with Flent antinoise stopples         

        (collated from Zwislocki (3) and Von Gierke (4).                   

                                                                           

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||                      

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||| A = FLENTS           

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||                      

           10|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||| B = THEORETICAL LIMIT

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||     OF ATTENUATION BY

FUNCTION(db) |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||     EAR PROTECTORS   

             A    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||                      

             |----A---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||                      

             B    |   A  A  A | A AAA   A|   |  | |||                      

             |----B---B--|--|-A-|-|||----A---|--|-|||                      

             |    |   |  |  B | | |||    | A |  | |||                      

           30|----|---|--|--|-|-|-B||----|---A--|-A||                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  A |A|                      

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||B---|---|--|-||A                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||  B |   |  | |||                      

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||B                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    B   |  | B||                      

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|-B|-|||                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    | B |  | |||                      

           50|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||                      

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||                      

             |    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||                      

             |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||                      

            100                    1000           10000                    

                        FREQUENCY                                          

                                                                           

                                                                           

TABLE 2. Theshold for perception of rf sound (ambient noise level 70-      

         90 db).                                                           

                                                              Peak         

                                 Avg        Peak     Peak    Magnetic      

                                Power      Power   Electric   Field        

Trans-   Frequency,  Duty Cy.  Density,   Density   Field      amp.        

mitter      mc                 mw, cm2    mw, cm2   v cm     turns, m      

                                                                           

  A       1,310      .0015      0.4         267      14         4          

  B       2,982      .0004      2.1       5,250      63        17          

  C         425      .0038      1.0         263      15         4          

  D         425      .007       1.9         271      14         4          

  E         425      .014       3.2         229      13         3          

  F         425      .028       7.1         254      14         4          

                                                                           

                                                                           

FIG. 4. Threshold energy as a function of frequency of electromagnetic     

        energy (ambient noise level 70-90 db).                             

                                                                           

        10000|---------|-------------|--------------|                      

             |---------|-------------|--------------|                      

  PEAK       |---------|-------------|--------------|                      

  POWER      |---------|-------------|-------------*|                      

  DENSITY    |---------|-------------|------------*-|                      

  (mw/cm2)   |         |             |          *   |                      

             |---------|-------------|---------*----|                      

             |         |             |       *      |                      

             |---------|-------------|------*-------|                      

             |         |             |    *         |                      

             |         |             |   *          |                      

             |         |             | *            |                      

         1000|---------|-------------*--------------|                      

             |---------|-----------*-|--------------|                      

             |---------|---------*---|--------------|                      

             |         |       *     |              |                      

             |---------|-----*-------|--------------|                      

             | * * * * * * *         |              |                      

             |---------|-------------|--------------|                      

             |         |             |              |                      

             |         |             |              |                      

             |         |             |              |                      

          100|---------|-------------|--------------|                      

            200       1000          2000           3000                    

                        FREQUENCY (mc)                                     

                                                                           

                                                                           

FIG. 5. Microwave power distribution in a forehead model neglecting        

        resonance effects and considering only first reflections           

        (from Nieset et al. (5), modified).                                

                                                                           

             |    REFLECTED                    ABSORBED                    

          1.5|--- FREQUENCIES                  FREQUENCIES                 

             |                   * *                                       

             |                  *    *         * = 10% OF INCIDENT         

 CENTIMETERS |Cortical         *                       POWER               

             |Tissue                    *                                  

             |                *                @ = 20% OF INCIDENT         

          1.0|---                         *            POWER               

             |                *                                            

             |                *              *                             

             |Bone                                                         

             |               *                 *                           

             |                                                             

          0.5|---           *      @  @   @       *                        

             |Muscle     *    @               @                            

             |Fat          @                     @    *                    

             |Skin       @                          @ @                    

            0|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|---          

             0          100        1000        10000       100000          

                        FREQUENCY (mc)                                     

                                                                           

                                                                           

FIG. 6. Area most sensitive to electromagnetic energy (shaded portion).    

                                                                           

                            *   *  * * * *                                 

                        *                    *                             

                      *                        *                           

                     * *       ::::::           *                          

                      *  *   :::::::::          *                          

                     *  O  *  ::::::::          *                          

                   *              * *           *                          

                     *               *          *                          

                     *               *         *                           

                      ***         **          *                            

                     *        *             *                              

                       *  * * *             *                              

                              *              *                             

                              *               *                            

                               * * * * * * * * *                           

                                                                           



At one time in our experimentation with deaf subjects there seemed to

be a clear relationship between the ability to hear audio above 5 kc

and the ability to hear rf sounds.  If a subject could hear above 5

kc, either by bone or air conduction, then he could hear the rf

sounds.  For example, the threshold of the subject whose audio gram

appears in Fig. 2 was the same average power density as our normal

subjects.  Recently, however, we have found people with a notch

around 5 kc who do not perceive the rf sounds generated by at least

one of our transmitters.



THRESHOLDS 



As shown in Table 1, we have used a fairly wide range of transmitter

parameters.  We are currently experimenting with transmitters that

radiate energy at frequencies below 425 mc, and are using different

types of modulation, e.g., pulse-repetition rates as low as 3 and

4/sec.



In the experimentation reported in this section, the ordinary noise

level was 70-90 db (measured with a General Radio Co. model 1551-B

sound level meter.)  In order to minimize the rf energy used in the

experimentation, subjects wore Flent antinoise ear stoppers whenever

measurements were made.  The ordinary noise attenuation of the Flents

is indicated in Fig. 3.  Although the rf sounds can be heard without

the use of Flents, eventhough they have an ambient noise evel of 90

db, it appears that the ambient noise to some extent "masked" the rf

sound.



Table 2 gives the thresholds for the perception of the sounds.  It

shows fairly clearly that the critical factor in the perception of

the rf sound is the peak power density, rather than the average power

density.  The relatively high value for transmitter B was expected

and will be discussed below.  Transmitter G has been omitted from the

table since the 20-mw/cm2 reading for it can be considered only

approximate.  The field-strength-measuring instruments used in that

experiment did not read high enough to give an accurate reading.  The

energy from transmitter H was not perceived, even when the peak power

density was as high as 25 w/cm2.



When the threshold energy is plotted as a function of the rf energy

(Fig. 4), a curve is obtained which is suggestive of the curve of

penetration of rf energy into the head.  Figure 5 shows the

calculated penetration, by frequency of rf energy, into the head. Our

data indicate that the calculated penetration curve may well be

accurate at the higher frequencies but the penetration at the lower

frequencies may be greater than that calculated on this model.



As previously noted, the thresholds were obtained in a high ambient

noise environment.  This is an unusual situation as compared to

obtaining thresholds of regular audio sound.  One recent

experimentation leads us to believe that, if the ambient noise level

were not so high, these threshold fields strengths would be much

lower. Since one purpose of this paper is to suggest experiments, it

might be appropriate to theories as to what the rf sound threshold

might be if we assumed that the subject is in an anechoic chamber.

It is also assumed that there is no transducer noise.



Given: As a threshold for the rf sound, a peak power density of 275

mw/cm2 determined in an ambient noise environment of 80 db. Earplugs

attenuate the ambient noise 30 db.



If: 1 mw/cm2 is set equal to o db, then 275 mw/cm2 is equal to 24 db.



Then: We can reduce the rf energy 50 db to -26 db as we reduce the

noise level energy from 50 db to o db.  We found that -26 db rf

energy is approximately 3 _u_w/cm2.



Thus:  If an anechoic room, rf sound could theoretically be induced

by a peak power density of 3 _u_w/cm2 measured in free space.  Since

only 10% of this energy is likely to penetrate the skull, the human

auditory system and a table radio may be one order of magnitude apart

in sensitivity to rf energy.



Up to Contents



RF DETECTOR IN AUDITORY SYSTEM 



One possibility that seems to have been ruled out in our

experimentation is that of a capacitor-type effect with the tympanic

membrane and oval window acting as plates of a capacitor. It would

seem possible that these membranes, acting as plates of a capacitor,

could be set in motion by rf energy.  There are, however, three

points of evidence against this possibility.  First, when one rotates

a capacitor in an rf field, a rather marked change occurs in the

capacitor as a function of its orientation in the field.  When our

subjects rotate or change the positions of their heads in the field,

the loudness of the rf sound does not change appreciably.  Second,

the distance between these membranes is rather small, compared with

the wavelengths used.  As a third point, we found that one of our

subjects who has otosclerosis heard the rf sound.



Another possible location for the detecting mechanism is in the

cochlea.  We have explored this possibility with nerve-deaf people,

but the results are inconclusive due to factors such as tinnitus. We

are currently exploring this possibility with animal preparations.



The third likely place for the detection mechanism is the brain. Burr

and Mauro (6) presented evidence that indicates that there is an

electrostatic field about neurons.  Morrow and Sepiel (7) presented

evidence that indicates the existence of a magnetic field about

neurons.  Becker (personal communication) has done some work

indicating that there is longitudinal flow of charged carriers in

neurons.  Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that possibly the

electromagnetic field could interact with neuron fields.  As yet,

evidence of this possibility is inconclusive.  The strongest point

against it is that we have not found visual effects although we have

searched for them.  On the other hand, we have obtained other

nonauditory effects and have found that the sensitive area for

detecting rf sounds is a region over the temporal lobe of the brain.

One can shield, with a 2-in.2 piece of fly screen, a portion of the

stippled area shown in Fig. 6 and completely cut off the rf sound.



Another possibility should also be considered.  There is no good

reason to assume that there is only one detector site.  On the

contrary, the work of Jones et al. (8), in which they placed

electrodes in the ear and electrically stimulated the subject, is

sufficiently relevant to suggest the possibility of more than one

detector site. Also, several sensations have been elicited with

properly modulated electromagnetic energy.  It is doubtful that all

of these can be attributed to one detector.



As mentioned earlier, the purpose of this paper is to focus the

attention of physiologists on an unusual area and stimulate

additional work on which interpretations can be based.

Interpretations have been deliberately omitted from this paper since

additional data are needed before a clear picture can emerge. It is

hoped that the additional exploration will also result in an increase

in our knowledge of nervous system functions.



REFERENCES:



Neider, P.C. and W.D. Neff. Science 133: 1010, 1961. 



Frey, A.H.  Aero Space Med. 32: 1140, 1961.



Zwislocki, J. Noise Control 4:42, 1958.



Von Gierke, H. Noise Control 2:37, 1956.



Nifset, R., Pinneo R. Baus J. Fleming, & R. McAfee.  Ann. Rept. USAF

Rome Air Development Command, TR-61-65, 1961. 



Burr, H., & J.  Seipel, J. Wash Acad. Sci. 21: 455, 1949.



Morrow, R., & J.  Seipel. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 30: 1, 1969.



Jones, R.C., S.S.  Stevens, & M.H. Laurie. J. Acoust. Sci. Am. 12:

281, 1940.



Up to Contents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX PM3 - NASA ARTICLE



TITLE: Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of

conscious rats



Original web link, folded for readability

http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ntrs/hget.cgi?recon?2044/3=/raid5/index/

     star/80%2517043725%202044%20N19810004209recon1



..........................................................

Eleanor White's inserted note:



See the ITALIC text below.  This abstract has implications

FAR beyond "rats"

..........................................................



Document ID:   19810004209  N (81N12720) File Series: NASA Technical Reports

Report Number: AD-A090426

Sales Agency & Price: CASI Hardcopy or Microfiche



Authors:

Oscar, K. J. (Army Mobility Equipment Command)



Published: Jun 01, 1980



Corporate Source:

Army Mobility Equipment Command (Fort Belvoir, VA, United States)

Pages: 10

Contract Number: None



NASA Subject Category: LIFE SCIENCES (GENERAL)



Abstract:



A decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to

remotely create the perception of noise in the heads of personnel by

exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves. When people are

illuminated with properly modulated low power microwaves the

sensation is reported as a buzzing, clicking, or hissing which seems

to originate (regardless of the person's position in the field)

within or just behind the head. The phenomena occurs at average power

densities as low as microwatts per square centimeter with carrier

frequencies from 0.4 to 3.0 GHz. By proper choice of pulse

characteristics, intelligible speech may be created. Before this

technique may be extended and used for military applications, an

understanding of the basic principles must be developed. Such an

understanding is not only required to optimize the use of the concept

for camouflage, decoy and deception operations but is required to

properly assess safety factors of such microwave exposure.



Major Subject Terms:



AUDITORY PERCEPTION 

BRAIN CIRCULATION

DECEPTION

MICROWAVES

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS

RADIATION EFFECTS



Minor Subject Terms:



BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS

HEMODYNAMICS

MILITARY TECHNOLOGY

RADIATION DOSAGE

SOUND LOCALIZATION



Language Note: English



NASA Access Help Desk



E-mail:  help@sti.nasa.gov

Phone:   301-621-0390  

FAX: 301-621-0134



Eleanor White's comments:  I have received this report in it's

entirety and I find that the article itself is about the title:

Cerebral blood flow in rats.  We involuntary experimentees are 

extremely lucky that the authors mentioned the success of microwave 

voice to skull transmission in this official document.



Below I have extracted some of the references to the full document 

which appear to be more promising and specific.  This sub-list is

guesswork since the references omit article titles, but any articles

by Frey or Justesen are potentially useful.



1.  Frey, A.H., Messenger, R. and Eichert, E.,

    National Technical Information Service,

    Doc. No. AD747684 (1972)



5.  Justesen, D.R., IEEE Spectrum 16, 67-68 (1979)



7.  Frey, A.H., Feld, S.R., & Frey, B. Annals of

    N.Y. Academy of Science, 247, 433-439 (1975)



18. Frey, A.H., & Messenger, R., Science  181,

    356-358 (1973)



25. Frey, A.H., & Feld, S.R., Journal of Comp.

    Physiology and Psychology,  89, 183-188

    (1975)



27. King, N.W., Justesen, D.R., & Clarke, R.L.,

    Science  172, 398-401 (1977)



Up to Contents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX PM4 - SEA/KOHN'S PROJECTS



Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect


Web address:

http://es.epa.gov/ncerqa_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html

Awarding Agency:  Department of Defense
SBIR Contract Number: F41624-95-C-9007
Title: Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect
Principal Investigator: Mr. Brian Kohn


Company Name:
Science & Engineering Assoc, Inc.
6100 Uptown Blvd NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Telephone Number: 505-884-2300
Business Representative:
Project Period:
Project Amount: $739,995
Research Category: Monitoring/Analytical


Description:


An innovative and revolutionary technology is described that offers a

means of low-probability-of-intercept Radio frequency (RF)

communications.  The feasibility of the concept has been

established using both a low intensity laboratory system and a

high power RF transmitter.  Numerous military applications exist in

areas of search and rescue, security and special operations.


Supplemental Keywords: small business, SBIR,
See also: http://www.seabase.com

Last Updated:  November 17, 1997


BRIAN KOHN'S PROJECT, EARLIER STUDY:



Program: SBIR

Agency: AF  Field

Office: AL

TOPIC Number: AF93-026

Control Number: 93AL -185

Contract Number: F41624-93-C-9013

Phase: 1

Awarded In: 93

Award Amount: $37,806

Award Start Date: 17 MAY 93

Award Completion Date: 17 DEC 93

Proposal Title: Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect

Principal Investigator Name:Brian Kohn

Principal Investigator Phone:505-884-2300

Firm SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC.

SEA Plaza 

6100 Uptown Blvd NE

SUITE 700

Albuquerque, NM 87110

Woman Owned:  N

Minority Owned:  N

Number of Employees:  95



Keywords:

MICROWAVE HEARING RF HEARING

BONE CONDUCTION THERMOELASTIC

COCHLEAR MICROPHONICS



Abstract:  



In this research program, we plan to investigate a revolutionary new

form of communication based on the microwave auditory effect. This

proposed communication idea satisfies the requirements for an

innovative, natural interface requiring no learning or training for

efficient operation and effective communications. The purpose of the

program proposed here is to extend the results of a recent

feasibility study, performed for the Armstrong Laboratory/OEDR. The

study found that voice communications, via the microwave auditory

effect, are highly feasible. In Phase I of this SBIR, we propose to

investigate the range of potential applications for this radically

different form of voice communication and recommend hardware and

systems concepts suitable for laboratory and brassboard

demonstrations to be built under Phase II.



Up to Contents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX PM5 - BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION



Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems

edited by Dr. James C. Lin, University of Illinois

1989 Plenum Press, New York



Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Interactions of 

Electromagnetic Waves with Biological Systems, held as part

of the Twenty-Second General Assembly of the International 

Union of Radio Science, Aug 25 - Sept 2, 1987, in Tel Aviv,

Israel.



ISBN 0-306-43109-2

QP82.2.N64E44 1989

612.01448-dc19 88-38957

CIP



Eleanor White's comments on this posting:



This book focusses on NON-ionizing radiation, and contains 

detailed texts about NON-THERMAL effects.  In other words, 

"right up our alley".



The main use of this book is to show that it is easy for

electromagnetic signals to cause radio frequency hearing and other

effects at LOW power levels.  This in turn can be used to explain why

DETECTION is so very difficult.



I don't understand the biological jargon, however, a few of the more

plain-language paragraphs STUNNINGLY verify that with careful choice

of signal frequency and modulation, not only can the body's cells

detect the modulation envelope of an incoming radio signal (i.e.

function as a "cellular crystal set") but even AMPLIFY these

carefully formed signals.  (Amplification of other effects, such as

proneness to disease, is also covered in the book.)



"Detection", in terms of radio signal reception, means that some

portion of the reciever "rectifies", that is, turns the AC of the 

incoming signal into varying DC.  If this conversion is not done, 

voice to skull wouldn't work.



The book touches also on ways in which cells communicate, and 

shows that electromagnetic fields of relatively weak power levels 

can affect intercellular communication, which is, as I understand 

the subject, what the brain is "all about".



Bio-amplification is apparently why radio signals of very low average

power ("MICROwatts" per NASA) can still produce audio effects,

and no doubt plays a part in difficulties in detection.



When two more characteristics of voice to skull are factored in:



1. The carrier signal can be "hopped" continuously within the 

   bioeffective bandwidth, known as "spread spectrum" transmission, 

   and,



2. The voice modulation most effective for undetectable hypnosis 

   is evidently a voice shifted just above normal hearing, but still 

   audible to the brain,



...you have a recipe for incredibly difficult signals to detect.



This book is a mainstream publication, very well suited to use 

in our publicity and persuasion campaigns, and our dealings with 

authorities who claim radio signals don't affect living tissue 

except to heat it.



Finally, many thanks to Blanche Chavoustie for providing me

photocopies of this book - a saintly work!

.............................................................

Page 110:

...

At that time [1953] excitatory mechanisms in nerver fibers

and nerve cells were grouped under a common rubric of ionic

equilibrium mechanisms.  There was little interest in the

possibility that functional organization of mebranes of cell

bodies might involve threshhold sensitivities to both

oscillating EM fields and to molecular stimuli at energy

levels substantially lower than predicted by Hodgkin-

Huxley models, and substantially below typical threshholds

in nerve fibers.



Much recent research cited below has shown that imposed weak

low frequency fields (and radiofrequency fields amplitude-

modulated at ELF frequencies) that are many orders of 

magnitude weaker in the pericellular fluid [fluid between

adjacent cells] than the membrane potential gradient [voltage

across the membrane] can modulate actions of hormone, anti-

body neurotransmitter and cancer-promoter molecules at their

cell surface receptor sites.



From their electrical characteristics, these sensitivities

appear to involve nonequilibrium and highly cooperative

processes that mediate a major amplification of initial

weak triggers associated with binding of these molecules at

their specific cell surface receptor sites.



(Adey, 1983, 1986, 1987; Adey and Lawrence, 1984; Lawrence

and Adey, 1982).



Page 122:



Cooperative Modification of Calcium Binding by RF Fields

at Cell Surfaces with Amplification of Initial Signals



Initial stimuli associated with weak perpindicular EM fields

and with binding of stimulating molecules at their membrane

receptor sites elicit a HIGHLY COOPERATIVE modification of

Ca++ binding to glycoproteins along the membrane surface.



As noted above, a longitudinal spread is consistent with 

the direction of extracellular current flow associated with

physiological activity and imposed EM fields.  This cooper-

ative modification of surface Ca++ binding is an

AMPLIFYING STAGE, with evidence from concurent initial molecular 

binding events by imposed RF fields that there is a far greater

increase in Ca++ efflux than is accounted for in the events of

receptor-ligand binding (Bawin and Adey, 1976; Bawin et al, 

1975; Liu-Liu and Adey, 1982).



Page 124:

...

Enzymes are protein molecules that function as catalysts, 

initiating and enhancing chemical reactions that would not

otherwise occur at tissue temperatures.  This ability resides

in the pattern of electrical charges on the molecular surface.

In the fashion of more familiar chemical catalysts, such as

the hydrocarbon oxidation systems which function only at very

high temperatures in automotive exhaust systems, a catalyst

emerges unchanged from these reactions and is thus able to

participate indefinitely in a specific reaction.



Activation of these enzymes and the reactions in which they

participate involve energies millions of times greater than

in the cell surface cell surface triggering events initiated

by the EM fields, emphasizing the MEMBRANE AMPLIFICATION

inherent in this trans-membrane signaling sequence.



Page 131:

...

Stimulus Amplification in Cooperative Systems

...

It is therefore clear that OBSERVED EM field interactions

with cells and tissues based on oscillating ELF tissue gradients

between 10 E-7 and 10 E-1 volts per centimeter would involve

cooperativity MANY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE GREATER than envisaged in

the examples just cited.



In part this discrepancy appears to relate to far greater

sensitivities to low-frequency EM fields [EW: ELF, that is, the

"entrainment" frequencies] and to RF fields with low-frequency

amplitude-modulation [EW: this includes radar hearing signals]

than to imposed step functions or DC gradients [EW: common

with contact electrodes, not of interest in mind control at a

distance] used in many electrochemical experiments and models

to test levels of cooperativity in biological systems.

(Blank, 1972)



[EW: In plain language, both entrainment (ELF) fields and

pulsating radar-like (RF) fields are a hell of a lot more

influential on cells than some experimental work using DC

and electrode methods.]



Page 95:



[EW: This section is not part of the demonstration that EM

signals can be biologically amplified, as above.  It's main

interest is that a magnetophosphene "gun" was under consider-

ation by the U.S. National Institute of Justice in 1993, along

with a "fever" gun and a "convulsion" gun, both using micro-

wave technology.  As of 1999, nothing has been heard from NIJ

on this development, however, page 95 here suggests that such

a microwave weapon is feasible.]



Magnetophosphenes



An effect of time-varying magnetic fields on humans was first

described by d'Arsonval (1896) [EW: Anyone doubt there has

been some progress since 1896?] is the induction of a flicker-

ing illumination within the visual field field known as

magnetophosphenes.  This phenomenon occurs as an immediate

response to stimulation by either pulsed or sinusoidal magnetic

fields with frequencies less than 100 Hz, and the effect is

completely reversible with no apparent influence on visual

acuity.  The maximum visual sensitivity to sinusoidal magnetic

fields has been found at a frequency of 20 Hz in human subjects

with normal vision.



[EW: Radio signals are a combination of electric and magnetic

fields.  To radiate a 20 Hz signal would require such huge

antennas that it is impractical to do so.  I'd recommend that

if someone has the facilities and skills, I'd try some VHF (or

microwave) pulsing at 20 Hz on an RF carrier at, say, the 2-meter

(144-148 MHz) ham band with a duty cycle, say, of 20% pulse-ON 

time.]



Up to Contents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX PM6 - VOICE TO SKULL, 1974 SUCCESS



Microwaves and Behavior

Dr. Don R. Justesen

Laboratories of Experimental Neuropsychology

Veterans Administration Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri

as published in

American Psychologist

Journal of the American Psychological Association

Volume 30, March 1975, Number 3



................ Eleanor's comments .........................

This LAYS TO REST ANY DOUBTS THAT VOICE TO SKULL 

TECHNOLOGY DOES NOT EXIST OR IS "IN THE FUTURE"!  

PERIOD!



This article describes in precise terms how Dr. Joseph C.

Sharp and staff transmitted the WORDS for the digits 1 to 10

using a modulated version of an Allan Frey type pulsed

microwave transmitter.  A detailed description of Frey

transmitters can be viewed at:



Appendix PM2



The relevant text is below.

.............................................................

Page 396:



...



The demonstration of sonic transduction of microwave energy

by materials lacking in water LESSENS the likelihood that a

thermohydraulic principle is operating in human perception 

of the energy.  Nonetheless, some form of thermoacoustic

transduction probably underlies perception.  If so, it is 

clear that simple heating is NOT a sufficient basis for the

Frey effect; the requirement for pulsing of radiations 

appears to implicate a thermodynamic principle.



Frey and Messenger (1973) and Guy, Chou, Lin, and Christen-

sen (1975) confirmed that a microwave pulse with a slow rise

time is INeffective in producing an auditory response; only

if the rise time is SHORT, resulting in effect in a square

wave with respect to the leading edge of the envelope of

radiated radio-frequency energy, does the auditory response

occur.



[Eleanor's comment:  This is why we don't "hear" ordinary 

radio and TV signals.]



Thus the rate of change (the first derivative) of the 

waveform of the pulse is a CRITICAL factor in perception.

Given a thermodynamic interpretation, it would follow that

information can be encoded in the energy and "communicated"

to the "listener".



Communication has in fact been demonstrated.  A. Guy (Note

1), a skilled telegrapher, arranged for his father, a retired

railroad telegrapher, to operate a key, each closure and 

opening of which resulted in a pulse of microwave energy.

By directing the radiations at his own head, complex mess-

ages via the Continental Morse Code were readily received

by Guy.



Sharp and Grove (note 2) found that appropriate modu-

lation of microwave energy can result in "wireless" and

"receiverless" communication of SPEECH.  The recorded by

voice on tape each of the single-syllable words for digits

between 1 and 10.  The electrical sine-wave analogs of each

word were then processed so that each time a sine wave

crossed ZERO REFERENCE IN THE NEGATIVE DIRECTION, a brief

pulse of microwave energy was triggered.



[Eleanor's comment:  This is, in effect a form of what is 

called pulse-RATE modulation.]



By radiating themselves with these "voice modulated" 

microwaves, Sharp and Grove were READILY able to hear,

identify, and distinguish among the 9 words.  [Typo?]

The sounds heard were not unlike those emitted by persons

with artificial larynxes.



Communication of more complex words and of sentences was

not attempted because the averaged densities of energy

required to transmit longer messages would approach the

current 10 milliwatts per square centimeter limit of safe

exposure.



The capability of communicating directly with a human being

by "receiverless radio" has obvious potentialities both 

within and without the clinic.  But the hotly debated and

unresolved question of how much microwave radiation a human

being can safely be exposed to will probably forestall

applications within the near future.



...



Up to Contents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX PM7 - U.S. GOVT DOCUMENT RE: RUSSIAN MIND CONTROL



A Warning to the World from Russian Psychotronic Researchers



Unclassified FOIA document, courtesy Cheryl Welsh, which is a bulletin

circulated among U.S. government agencies reviewing an October 6, 1995 

Russian TV news segment titled "Man and Law" on the topic of mind 

control technology.  The images below complement another video produced 

by German ZDF TV and shown on December 22, 1998.  The 1998 video's

transcribed sound track, in English is posted at:



http://www.raven1.net/russvid.htm



Here are the images of the FOIA document:




       


Up to Contents --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PM8 - OAK RIDGE LABS AND OTHER BULLETINS THE FOLLOWING SET OF ARTICLES HIGHLIGHTS OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABS' RESEARCH INTO RADIO FREQUENCY WEAPONS. I HAVE PHONED THEM AND THE 1993 NEWS RELEASE BELOW IS GENUINE. E.W. ...................................................................... Date sent: Fri, 10 May 1996 17:52:55 -0700 (PDT) To: MindNet@c2.org From: vericomm@c2.org Subject: MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 73 V E R I C O M M / MindNet "Quid veritas est?" Sender: Owner-MindNet@c2.org The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless otherwise noted. Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the copy remain intact and unedited. Editor: Mike Coyle Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler Research: Darrell Bross PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPMENT OF LESS-THAN-LETHAL WEAPONS Oak Ridge National Laboratory Physiological Responses Applicable to Development of Less-Than-Lethal Weapons Sponsored by National Institute of Justice Oak Ridge National Laboratory Less-than-lethal weapons have a variety of applications in law enforcement, including rescuing hostages, stopping fleeing felons, and quelling prison disturbances. The National Institute of Justice is sponsoring a broad program to develop new techniques for "friendly force" as an alternative to the use of deadly force. As part of this program, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is examining approaches based on known physiological responses to certain types of stimuli. These "weapons" would temporarily incapacitate an individual or a group with no lasting physiological damage. These concepts are based on ORNL's experience and expertise in biological-based systems and biophysical responses, particularly in evaluating the physical responses of humans to a variety of chemical, physical and radiological agents. ORNL also has extensive experience and expertise in risk analysis and in risk assessment and modeling. The ORNL less than-lethal weapons project sponsored by the National Institute of Justice began in September 1993. The following tasks are being performed: * Locate and compile data from tests, accidents, medical literature, etc. on biological and biophysical responses to energetic stimuli (such as electromagnetic fields). * Analyze the information and identify promising candidate mechanisms for further development for a friendly force * Evaluate the applicability of the proposed approaches to several realistic scenarios (such as hostage rescue or riot control). ORNL has already examined several possible concepts for less-than-lethal weapons based on known physiological responses to energetic stimuli, including a thermal gun, a seizure gun, and a magnetophosphene gun. A thermal gun would have the operational effect of heating the body to 105 to 107F, thereby incapacitating any threat, based on the fact that even a slight fever can affect the ability of a person to perform even simple tasks. This approach is built on four decades of research relating radio frequency exposure to body heating. A seizure gun would use electromagnetic energy to induce epileptic-like seizures in persons within the range of a particular electromagnetic field. The magnetophosphene gun is designed around a biophysical mechanism which evokes a visual response and is thought to be centered in the retina, known as magnetophosphenes. This effect is experienced when a person receives a blow to the head and sees "stars". This same effect can be produced with electromagnetic energy. While there are a number of technical challenges to be overcome in building devices of these types, less-than-lethal weapons based on physiological responses to energetic stimuli would provide a safe and effective means of dealing with a number of law enforcement situations where use of deadly force is not desirable. For further information contact: Ray Downs, National Institute of Justice (202) 616-3509 Susan Sherrow, Oak Ridge Special Projects Office (615) 576-8024 Oak Ridge National Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ................................................................ MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn173.txt] To receive the MindNet Journal via email: Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: . To unsubscribe: Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: . Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our=20 FTP Archive site:=20 [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/] MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt] Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions, bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics will be accepted with the author's statement of permission to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles for submission to: , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM, POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA. VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products, merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal. The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle, , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA. The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in=20 cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072, Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA. ...................................................................... Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Section A, November 22, 1976 Mind-Altering Microwaves: Soviets Studying Invisible Ray A newly declassified U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency report says extensive Soviet research into microwaves might lead to methods of causing disoriented human behavior, nerve disorders, and even heart attacks. ... A copy of the study was provided by the agency to the Associated Press in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act. ... Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intercranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities, the study said. ... One physiological effect which has been demonstrated is heart seizure, the report said. It said this has been accomplished experimentally in frogs by synchronizing the pulses of a microwave signal with the animal's heartbeat and beaming the radiation at the chest area. ...................................................................... Microwave News, January-February 1987 ZAP! Six hundred scientists and engineers with security clearances spend the first week of December at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico examining the potential of high-power microwaves to zap enemy electronics... ... Many branches of the Department of Defense were represented, including the Air Force, the Army and the Navy, together with DARPA, DIA, and DNA. The Lawrence Livermore Labs were also well represented, as were most of the big defense contractors - General Dynamics, Physics International and TRW each have a high-power microwave testing facility. In addition to these sources, susceptibility and hardening, there was one on biological effects: Dr. David Erwin and Major Robert Downs represented the Air Force and Howard Bassen and Dr. John D'Andrea described the Army and Navy programs, respectively. Dr. Frank Barnes of the University of Colorado in Boulder presented a poster paper on his and Dr. Howard Wachtel's research on the effects of pulsed microwaves. Chuck de Caro, a former correspondent for the Cable News Network, considers the possibility that the U.S. is falling behind the U.S.S.R. in microwave weapons in "The Zap Gap", to be published in the March issue of "The Atlantic" (see also MWN November- December 1986). ...................................................................... Microwave News, January-February 1996 RF WEAPONS - Disabling People and Electronics The military continues to explore development of RF weapons for the conflicts of the future. For instance, the "First Directed Energy Warfare (DEW) Conference", held last year at the Mitre Corp. in McLean VA, featured Dr. David Erwin of the Armstrong Lab at Brooks AFB, San Antonio, TX, on "Directed Energy Warfare RF Effects", and D.r Jose Pina of the CIA on "Ground Combat Applications of RF". Other topics included "Personnel Vulnerability" and Directed Energy Warfare Biological Effects". The June meeting was organized by the Association of Old Crows, whose members are specialists in electronic warfare. Conference participants had to have security clearances of "Secret" or higher, as has been the case at similar meetings in the past (See MWN, J-F 87 and N-D 93). Public discussions of RF/MW weapons have focussed on dis- rupting technology. But a recent Article in the Airpower Journal revealed "for the first time that the military is developing high-powered microwave weapons for use against human beings", reports Peter Cassidy in the January 1996 "Progressive" (see p. 14). RF/MW and EMF-based weapons are also being studied for civilian law enforcement. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge TN will soon complete a literature review for the National Insitute of Justice on the feasibility of "thermal guns" which could heat the body to 105 to 107 degrees F and incapacitate the target; "seizure guns" which would use EM energy to induce epileptic-like seizures; and "magnetophosphene guns" which would cause the target to "see stars". The institute's Ray Downs in Washington cautioned that the report may not be made public. ORNL's Dr. Clay Easterly has said that some effects not associated with heating could be useful in developing nonlethal weapons. (See MWN, N-D 93.) ...................................................................... Microwave News, September-October 1996, page 19 Stop That Car or We'll Zap You They're the sexiest gadgets in this year's action movies: EMP weapons, which use electromagnetic pulses to zap electronics. They have starring roles in Goldeneye, the latest James Bond movie, as well as in Broken Arrow, Escape From LA, and Eraser. And soon they may be coming to a police car near you. Law Enforcement News (September 30) reports that the U.S. Army and the National Institute of Justice are running a $500,000 field test to see if EMP guns can force a car to stop by disabling its electrical systems. The plan is to use EMP to do away with high speed chases (another Hollywood staple). This is another example of the growing interest in using nonlethal weapons developed by the military. ... Up to Contents --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX US1 - SILENT SOUND Eleanor White's comments: This article shows clearly the military's intent to use every possible thought-influencing technology. This technology is largely classified but there are leaks, like this article. We involuntary test subjects can tell you from first hand experience that far more invasive devices now exist. This article represents one of the two parallel "tracks" on which thought-influencing technology is being used and further developed: - Radio frequency signals, based on the WW II phenomenon called "radar hearing" - Ultrasound signals, which can be transmitted through the air or piggybacked on to radio/TV signals ...................................................................... NEXUS Volume 5, Issue 6 October/November 1998 $25/6 issues/ 1 year 1998 Nexus New Times 888-909-7474 nexus@peg.apc.org -------------------------- EXCERPT: More in magazine. -------------------------- Military Use of Mind Control Weapons Judy Wall 1998 PSY-OPS WEAPONRY USED IN THE PERSIAN GULF WAR For years, rumours have persisted that the United States Department of Defense has been engaged in research and development of ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London) wire service bulletins.[1] The March 23, 1991 newsbrief, "High-Tech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the Middle East", describes a US Psychological Operations (PsyOps) tactic directed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm. The manoeuvre consisted of a system in which subliminal mind-altering technology was carried on standard radiofrequency broadcasts. The March 26, 1991 newsbrief states that among the standard military planning groups in the centre of US war planning operations at Riyadh was "an unbelievable and highly classified PsyOps program utilising 'silent sound' techniques". The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency. The US PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter, utilising the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji. This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with patriotic and religious music, PsyOps transmitted "vague, confusing and contradictory military orders and information". Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a sophisticated electronic system to 'speak' directly to the mind of the listener, to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate his brain's electroencephalograph ic (EEG) patterns and artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear, anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn't just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it implants that emotion in their minds.[2] I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United States. Readers of Resonance may recall that in the Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I wondered if there was any significance to this. At the library I pulled up back issues of my local newspaper for the same time-period of the Gulf War to see what the American wire services had said, if anything, about the use of this special PsyOps weapon. There was nothing said about it directly, but three news articles seemed related. In a news release from Associated Press during the same timeframe of the Gulf War truce, I read: "The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48 hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots