Of Laws in the Relation They Bear to a Defensive Force
1. In what Manner Republics provide for their
Safety. If a republic be small, it is destroyed by a foreign force; if
it be large, it is ruined by an internal imperfection.
To this twofold inconvenience democracies and aristocracies are equally
liable, whether they be good or bad. The evil is in the very thing itself,
and no form can redress it.
It is, therefore, very probable that mankind would have been, at length,
obliged to live constantly under the government of a single person, had
they not contrived a kind of constitution that has all the internal
advantages of a republican, together with the external force of a
monarchical, government. I mean a confederate republic.
This form of government is a convention by which several petty states
agree to become members of a larger one, which they intend to establish.
It is a kind of assemblage of societies, that constitute a new one,
capable of increasing by means of further associations, till they arrive
at such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of the
It was these associations that so long contributed to the prosperity of
Greece. By these the Romans attacked the whole globe, and by these alone
the whole globe withstood them; for when Rome had arrived at her highest
pitch of grandeur, it was the associations beyond the Danube and the Rhine
— associations formed by the terror of her arms — that enabled
the barbarians to resist her.
Hence it proceeds that Holland,1
Germany, and the Swiss cantons are considered in Europe as perpetual
The associations of cities were formerly more necessary than in our
times. A weak, defenceless town was exposed to greater danger. By conquest
it was deprived not only of the executive and legislative power, as at
present, but moreover of all human property.2
A republic of this kind, able to withstand an external force, may
support itself without any internal corruption; the form of this society
prevents all manner of inconveniences.
If a single member should attempt to usurp the supreme power, he could
not be supposed to have an equal authority and credit in all the
confederate states. Were he to have too great an influence over one, this
would alarm the rest; were he to subdue a part, that which would still
remain free might oppose him with forces independent of those which he had
usurped, and overpower him before he could be settled in his usurpation.
Should a popular insurrection happen in one of the confederate states,
the others are able to quell it. Should abuses creep into one part, they
are reformed by those that remain sound. The state may be destroyed on one
side, and not on the other; the confederacy may be dissolved, and the
confederates preserve their sovereignty.
As this government is composed of petty republics, it enjoys the
internal happiness of each; and with regard to its external situation, by
means of the association, it possesses all the advantages of large
2. That a confederate Government ought to be
composed of States of the same Nature, especially of the republican Kind.
The Canaanites were destroyed by reason that they were petty monarchies,
that had no union or confederacy for their common defence; and, indeed, a
confederacy is not agreeable to the nature of petty monarchies.
As the confederate republic of Germany consists of free cities, and of
petty states subject to different princes, experience shows us that it is
much more imperfect than that of Holland and Switzerland.
The spirit of monarchy is war and enlargement of dominion: peace and
moderation are the spirit of a republic. These two kinds of government
cannot naturally subsist in a confederate republic.
Thus we observe, in the Roman history, that when the Veientes had chosen
a king, they were immediately abandoned by all the other petty republics
of Tuscany. Greece was undone as soon as the kings of Macedon obtained a
seat among the Amphyktyons.
The confederate republic of Germany, composed of princes and free towns,
subsists by means of a chief, who is, in some respects, the magistrate of
the union, in others, the monarch.
3. Other Requisites in a confederate Republic.
In the republic of Holland one province cannot conclude an alliance
without the consent of the others. This law, which is an excellent one,
and even necessary in a confederate republic, is wanting in the Germanic
constitution, where it would prevent the misfortunes that may happen to
the whole confederacy, through the imprudence, ambition, or avarice of a
single member. A republic united by a political confederacy has given
itself entirely up, and has nothing more to resign.
It is difficult for the united states to be all of equal power and
extent. The Lycian3 republic was an
association of twenty-three towns; the large ones had three votes in the
common council, the middling ones two, and the small towns one. The Dutch
republic consists of seven provinces of different extent of territory,
which have each one voice.
The cities of Lycia4 contributed
to the expenses of the state, according to the proportion of suffrages.
The provinces of the United Netherlands cannot follow this proportion;
they must be directed by that of their power.
In Lycia5 the judges and town
magistrates were elected by the common council, and according to the
proportion already mentioned. In the republic of Holland they are not
chosen by the common council, but each town names its magistrates. Were I
to give a model of an excellent confederate republic, I should pitch upon
that of Lycia.
4. In what Manner despotic Governments provide
for their Security. As republics provide for their security by
uniting, despotic governments do it by separating, and by keeping
themselves, as it were, single. They sacrifice a part of the country; and
by ravaging and desolating the frontiers they render the heart of the
It is a received axiom in geometry that the greater the extent of
bodies, the more their circumference is relatively small. This practice,
therefore, of laying the frontiers waste is more tolerable in large than
in middling states.
A despotic government does all the mischief to itself that could be
committed by a cruel enemy, whose arms it were unable to resist.
It preserves itself likewise by another kind of separation, which is by
putting the most distant provinces into the hands of a great vassal. The
Mogul, the king of Persia, and the emperors of China have their
feudatories; and the Turks have found their account in putting the
Tartars, the Moldavians, the Wallachians, and formerly the Transylvanians,
between themselves and their enemies.
5. In what Manner a Monarchical Government
provides for its Security. A monarchy never destroys itself like a
despotic government. But a kingdom of a moderate extent is liable to
sudden invasions: it must therefore have fortresses to defend its
frontiers; and troops to garrison those fortresses. The least spot of
ground is disputed with military skill and resolution. Despotic states
make incursions against one another; it is monarchies only that wage war.
Fortresses are proper for monarchies; despotic governments are afraid of
them. They dare not entrust their officers with such a command, as none of
them have any affection for the prince or his government.
6. Of the defensive Force of States in general.
To preserve a state in its due force, it must have such an extent as to
admit of a proportion between the celerity with which it may be invaded,
and that with which it may defeat the invasion. As an invader may appear
on every side, it is requisite that the state should be able to make on
every side its defence; consequently it should be of a moderate extent,
proportioned to the degree of velocity that nature has given to man, to
enable him to move from one place to another.
France and Spain are exactly of a proper extent. They have so easy a
communication for their forces as to be able to convey them immediately to
what part they have a mind; the armies unite and pass with rapidity from
one frontier to another, without any apprehension of such difficulties as
require time to remove.
It is extremely happy for France that the capital stands near to the
different frontiers in proportion to their weakness; and the prince has a
better view of each part of his country according as it is more exposed.
But when a vast empire, like Persia, is attacked, it is several months
before the troops are assembled in a body; and then they are not able to
make such forced marches, for that space of time, as they could for
fifteen days. Should the army on the frontiers be defeated, it is soon
dispersed, because there is no neighbouring place of retreat. The victor,
meeting with no resistance, advances with all expedition, sits down before
the capital, and lays siege to it, when there is scarcely time sufficient
to summon the governors of the provinces to its relief. Those who foresee
an approaching revolution hasten it by their disobedience. For men whose
fidelity is entirely owing to the danger of punishment are easily
corrupted as soon as it becomes distant; their aim is their own private
interest. The empire is subverted, the capital taken, and the conqueror
disputes the several provinces with the governors.
The real power of a prince does not consist so much in the facility he
meets with in making conquests as in the difficulty an enemy finds in
attacking him, and, if I may so speak, in the immutability of his
condition. But the increase of territory obliges a government to lay
itself more open to an enemy.
As monarchs therefore ought to be endued with wisdom in order to
increase their power, they ought likewise to have an equal share of
prudence to confine it within bounds. Upon removing the inconveniences of
too small a territory, they should have their eye constantly on the
inconveniences which attend its extent.
7. A Reflection. The enemies of a great
prince, whose reign was protracted to an unusual length, have very often
accused him, rather, I believe, from their own fears than upon any solid
foundation, of having formed and carried on a project of universal
monarchy. Had he attained his aim, nothing would have been more fatal to
his subjects, to himself, to his family, and to all Europe. Heaven, that
knows our true interests, favoured him more by preventing the success of
his arms than it could have done by crowning him with victories. Instead
of raising him to be the only sovereign in Europe, it made him happier by
rendering him the most powerful.
The subjects of this prince, who in travelling abroad are never affected
but with what they have left at home; who on quitting their own
habitations look upon glory as their chief object, and in distant
countries as an obstacle to their return; who disgust you even by their
good qualities, because they are tainted with so much vanity; who are
capable of supporting wounds, perils, and fatigues, but not of foregoing
their pleasures; who are supremely fond of gaiety, and comfort themselves
for the loss of a battle by a song upon the general: those subjects, I
say, would never have the solidity requisite for an enterprise of this
kind, which if defeated in one country would be unsuccessful everywhere
else; and if once unsuccessful, would be so for ever.
8. A particular Case in which the defensive Force
of a State is inferior to the offensive. It was a saying of the Lord
of Coucy to King Charles V that the English are never weaker, nor more
easily overcome, than in their own country. The same was observed of the
Romans; the same of the Carthaginians; and the same will happen to every
power that sends armies to distant countries, in order to reunite by
discipline and military force those who are divided among themselves by
political or civil interests. The state finds itself weakened by the
disorder that still continues, and more so by the remedy.
The Lord of Coucy's maxim is an exception to the general rule, which
disapproves of wars against distant countries. And this exception confirms
likewise the rule because it takes place only with regard to those by whom
such wars are undertaken.
9. Of the relative Force of States. All
grandeur, force, and power are relative. Care therefore must be taken that
in endeavouring to increase the real grandeur, the relative be not
During the reign of Louis XIV France was at its highest pitch of
relative grandeur. Germany had not yet produced such powerful princes as
have since appeared in that country. Italy was in the same case. England
and Scotland were not yet formed into one united kingdom. Aragon was not
joined to Castile: the distant branches of the Spanish monarchy were
weakened by it, and weakened it in their turn; and Muscovy was as little
known in Europe as Crim Tartary.
10. Of the Weakness of neighbouring States. Whensoever
a state lies contiguous to another that happens to be in its decline, the
former ought to take particular care not to precipitate the ruin of the
latter, because this is the happiest situation imaginable; nothing being
so convenient as for one prince to be near another, who receives for him
all the rebuffs and insults of fortune. And it seldom happens that by
subduing such a state the real power of the conqueror is as much increased
as the relative is diminished.
1. It is composed of about fifty
different republics, all different from one another. — M. Janisson,
State of the United Provinces.
2. Civil liberty, goods, wives,
children, temples, and even burying-places.
3. Strabo, xiv.
Next | Previous
| Text Version | Contents
| Liberty Library |