Up next in 10
How to Get Better Public Decisions 2010/01/25 (09)
2 views
Jun 5, 2025
Jon Roland explains how public decisons are made so poorly and how the quality might be improved. With Lela Pittenger. Austin Constitution Meetup Jan. 25, 2010.
View Video Transcript
0:00
and the the warnings are out there I
0:03
mean I'm delivering one of them to you
0:04
right
0:05
now you know I am one of the people who
0:09
can look at a complex derivative and
0:12
understand it and I could also tell that
0:15
the people who were writing these things
0:17
did not understand it and the people
0:20
they were working for didn't understand
0:22
them so you know what's wrong with that
0:26
picture if you can't understand it you
0:29
can't explain it it then maybe you
0:30
shouldn't be selling
0:33
it
0:35
um
0:37
so we have the d The Dilemma we're
0:43
in how do we get higher quality
0:46
decisions to be
0:47
made well I have a lot of ideas about
0:51
that
0:53
um
0:55
but uh it's not
0:57
easy when you pass leg
1:01
ation you have to realize that the the
1:05
legislation is not going to be carried
1:07
out by people like
1:11
you uh I have gotten legislation adopted
1:14
in
1:16
Congress and it mostly got screwed
1:20
up because one of the first problems you
1:23
run into is that to when you hire people
1:27
to carry out legislation you have to to
1:30
just put out an ad and take whoever
1:32
walks in the door that passes the the
1:36
the general Services
1:41
examination uh you have to hire by the
1:44
Numbers you're not getting True
1:47
Believers you're not getting people who
1:49
are particularly train well trained in
1:51
the subject area of the
1:54
legislation you're getting people who
1:56
can pass a you know get a an exam to get
2:00
a GS
2:02
level uh that's intended to prevent
2:07
corruption to prevent patronage well it
2:12
doesn't you don't get specific patronage
2:15
perhaps being able to pick and choose
2:17
who your you're going to hire for
2:20
particular
2:21
jobs
2:23
but as the Democrats have discovered you
2:26
get a general patronage by passing
2:28
legislation that hires a whole bunch of
2:31
people that then
2:33
feel that they want to vote for
2:37
Democrats in order to get even more jobs
2:41
of the same kind or uh get their larger
2:44
budgets and so forth which enables them
2:47
to get promoted and bigger pensions and
2:50
so you create a general patronage system
2:53
even if you don't have specific control
2:56
for you know picking and choosing
2:59
particular
3:01
individuals uh back when I was in the
3:05
military we had tried to avoid the
3:07
problem by reassigning people
3:10
regularly CH
3:12
officers an officer would stay in a uh
3:16
particular Duty station at most 3
3:21
years usually less time than
3:24
that the idea was to avoid Empire
3:28
Building you keep moving people around
3:30
and keep reassigning
3:32
them uh don't leave anybody in in one
3:35
position for too
3:37
long
3:39
um that is
3:42
a crude way to try to deal with a
3:44
problem but it has its
3:46
merits and one of my proposed reforms
3:49
for uh the civil
3:52
service is to keep rotating people
3:55
around from job to job so nobody stays
3:58
in a job for too long
4:00
that also needs to be done among
4:02
staffers for
4:05
congress a lot of people will call for
4:07
term limits of members of Congress but I
4:10
point out all that would do is make
4:11
staffers more important
4:14
yeah and what you really need to do is
4:17
to have a rotation among
4:20
staffers Let each one stay long enough
4:22
to acquire skills but not in one any one
4:26
position so that they don't have a
4:29
chance CH to develop these networks of
4:32
cronies that then become the real
4:36
power uh I also discovered U when I was
4:40
living on Capitol Hill I live six blocks
4:43
from the
4:44
capital I would sometimes hang out in a
4:48
local clubs one of them was called and
4:51
it's still there the hawk and
4:53
Dove I could sit at a table and be with
4:57
an earshot of another table
5:00
or I could hear Congressional staffers
5:02
meeting with their
5:04
handlers and interestingly enough the
5:07
handlers did not seem to be the
5:11
lobbyists of private
5:14
firms they mostly seem to be uh
5:18
executive branch a
5:20
agencies especially and I got the
5:23
distinct impression
5:27
CIA so you have had federal agencies
5:32
perhaps the
5:33
CIA uh developing personal relationships
5:36
with staffers in Congress inducing them
5:41
to do what the agencies
5:44
wanted now in that kind of situation
5:47
who's working for whom and to what
5:50
end uh I think if most
5:54
people uh could see what I saw they
5:58
would become rather dist
5:59
[Music]
6:01
Disturbed uh it was certainly an
6:04
education for
6:05
me and one of the reasons why I came
6:07
back and ran for
6:09
congress uh but it was
6:12
uh a kind of learning experience that be
6:15
very difficult to achieve in any other
6:17
way you don't learn that kind of thing
6:19
you don't learn what I learned in
6:22
college or university or even in a
6:25
government job most government
6:28
jobs uh you just have to get out there
6:31
and become involved in the process and
6:34
watch it from the inside and sometimes
6:38
he's drop on the next
6:40
table do a little spying of your own yes
6:44
well one of the favorite things uh sort
6:47
of favor
6:49
things a lot of what happens in
6:51
Washington happens in cocktail parns and
6:54
some are get
6:56
gathers well a lot of of
7:00
the actors players as we would call them
7:05
were attractive
7:07
women lobbyists spies
7:12
whatever uh most of them were not
7:16
attached so I would occasionally be
7:19
called to serve as an escort back in
7:22
those days it's no longer true but in
7:24
those days it was considered for you
7:28
know normal Al for uh men and women to
7:33
appear in Paris at these things so my uh
7:38
lobbyist by whatever uh female type
7:43
would invite me to be her escort so she
7:46
could show up with a guy we wouldn't
7:48
leave together we show up together and
7:52
she'd go do her thing trying to button
7:54
this Congressman or Senator or whatever
7:57
and uh you know I would do this doing
7:59
similar things uh trying to talk about
8:03
my favorite legislation or
8:06
whatever uh well we we'd occasionally
8:09
had some interesting conversations as we
8:11
were driving to the to the
8:14
event and I got a lot of insight into
8:17
how all that
8:19
worked uh now when I say spy I don't
8:22
mean spy of for foreign government
8:25
mostly spies for other uh special
8:28
interests
8:29
trying to figure out what the opposition
8:31
was doing you know so they could head
8:33
off uh the
8:35
opposition
8:38
uh
8:40
um and frankly I think most of the
8:45
gals uh were using sex as one of their
8:50
tools uh I couldn't prove it they didn't
8:52
admit to it but but you didn't do that I
8:55
didn't do that okay just making sure
#Law & Government
#Legislative Branch
#Public Policy
#Social Issues & Advocacy