Bob Bernhoft, FES Austin, 2012/12/15
140 views
Jun 5, 2025
Tax attorney Robert Bernhoft discusses legal issues with the income tax at the Free Enterprise Society meeting in Austin, Texas, Dec. 15, 2012.
View Video Transcript
0:00
had a schedule is being departed from
0:04
right now oh that's that's good shut it
0:06
down I would like to we're going to
0:08
probably have for whatever time we've
0:10
got left I got a good friend of mine
0:13
who's a lawyer here in Austin his name
0:15
is Bob
0:17
Bernard and he's one of these decrepit
0:20
lawyers the scum of the earth that
0:23
believes in the United States
0:26
Constitution now if you believe in the
0:28
United States Constitution you are
0:31
you know send them to the Slaughters
0:32
well anyway Bob's right here he's going
0:34
to come up and he's got all sorts of
0:37
very interesting War Stories and I
0:39
presume that he's going to tell us a war
0:41
story right
0:43
now but you
0:45
know one thing I do know about him he
0:49
really loves to shovel snow
0:54
so here's Bob
0:58
bof
1:01
I don't have to shovel snow
1:04
anymore uh as some of you know uh I was
1:07
born and bread in Upper Midwest
1:09
Milwaukee Wisconsin and um um I've had
1:12
my my little law firm up there uh for
1:14
about 12 13 years I was an older law
1:16
student had many careers before that and
1:19
um just uh two and a half uh two years
1:22
ago or so my wife and I decided that it
1:24
was time to make a change i' had done a
1:25
bunch of cases in Austin Texas and uh we
1:28
for some reason I just felt moved to do
1:30
it so we pulled the trigger uh shut down
1:32
everything up there and moved with our
1:34
key people families so uh Austin is now
1:37
uh my national headquarters we have a
1:38
little shop in Los Angeles but this is
1:40
where we live and work uh now and it's
1:42
good to be down here it really is um
1:45
I've always been impressed with the uh
1:48
independent ferocity the sort of
1:50
independent Spirit of Texas uh always
1:53
been intrigued by it enjoyed my time
1:55
down here and now I get to be a part of
1:57
it uh of course in Austin um we look
2:00
down upon at least until you've been
2:01
there about four or five years so uh I'm
2:05
still I've had you know I've was talking
2:07
to Larry about this I've been wearing uh
2:09
Larry Mayan boots since I was 16 years
2:11
old uh and then I gave them up for a
2:14
little bit I don't know why so now I get
2:15
to go to lucazi and get some lucazi
2:17
boots and I'm excited about that uh I
2:19
wanted to thank Steve hempling from free
2:21
enterprise Society uh for letting me
2:23
make a few comments up here and of
2:25
coursecraft um some of you may know
2:27
Larry and I did the Bernice kugan case
2:28
in 2003 in Memphis Tennessee um and and
2:31
Larry's the finest trial attorney I've
2:33
ever worked with um committed
2:36
disciplined uh and very effective um
2:40
couple things that I'm interested in
2:41
these days we we do a lot of Federal
2:43
Criminal tax representation not just
2:45
trial work but uh we also represent
2:47
people who are targeted by
2:48
administrative criminal investigations
2:50
and grand jury investigations um we also
2:53
do a good bit of civil tax audit
2:55
collection um and we're looking for
2:57
leverage to obtain outcomes for our
2:59
clients and one of the things that we've
3:01
used a lot lately um is a hybrid version
3:04
of Freedom of Information Act requests
3:06
foyer requests uh particularly during uh
3:08
criminal investigations and contrary to
3:11
some conventional misunderstanding you
3:13
can obtain uh a good bit of information
3:16
even during the pency of a criminal
3:18
investigation uh through Foya um and so
3:21
we've been doing a lot of that work the
3:22
other thing that I've been interested in
3:24
lately uh is government misconduct and I
3:27
had the privilege of appearing with Joe
3:29
banister and Jones's show in October and
3:32
we talked a little bit about this um
3:34
what we're seeing uh over the past 10
3:36
years now this this sort of misconduct
3:39
whether it's subornation of perjury
3:41
Discovery
3:42
violations um all manner of categories
3:46
of that sort of misconduct it's it's
3:48
always been Focus it's been typically
3:50
focused in what we call
3:52
disfavored litigant in other words the
3:55
system takes a look at it and says well
3:57
you know we got those dog on tax
3:59
protesters you know now the Attorney
4:00
General says uh it's it's tax def fires
4:03
they change the name once in a while we
4:05
can go after them and we can break the
4:08
rules but we won't break the rules
4:10
outside of that little narrow uh you
4:12
know nobody likes tax protesters right
4:14
nobody likes people that don't file
4:15
returns and pay tax so we'll be able to
4:17
break the rules regarding that small
4:18
subset of people and it'll never bleed
4:21
out to any anything else and that turns
4:23
out to be false and of course that's a
4:25
logical fallacy to suggest that you can
4:27
take and have different sets of rules
4:29
for certain types of people and that the
4:31
breaking of the rules and that pattern
4:33
is not going to bleed out across all
4:36
spectrum of society and it has in fact
4:40
uh um and that's what's wrong with that
4:42
sort of an idea that you can break the
4:44
rules get away with it because you don't
4:45
particularly like this little class of
4:47
people it also happens to be a bill of
4:49
attainer problem you know to identify a
4:52
certain class of individual by belief or
4:55
any other attribute and treat them
4:57
differently under what's supposed to be
4:59
the same set of laws that's a due
5:01
process violation and that's a that's a
5:03
bill of attainer and to some extent an
5:04
expost facto problem so we've uh we do a
5:08
lot of trial work and um I we I wanted
5:10
to talk briefly I'm not going to talk
5:11
for long I'm turn this back over to
5:12
Larry Larry's got some great stuff that
5:14
he's working with on the big board here
5:16
um but I want people to be thinking
5:18
about talking to friends and neighbors
5:19
and people in their Community not just
5:21
about beliefs about tax we really do
5:23
have to reach people about the
5:25
Transcendent principles what this should
5:26
be about I think what it is about for
5:28
most of us if not all of us is restoring
5:31
ordered Liberty and freedom in America
5:33
that's the fundamental proposition and
5:35
there's lots of ways to do that and I
5:37
encourage everybody to reach out across
5:39
the aisle to people of different
5:41
political stripes and Persuasions make
5:43
common cause with people on an issue
5:45
that you both share doesn't matter
5:47
whether they're Democrats or Republicans
5:48
or Libertarians or communist workers
5:50
socialist union party you got to reach
5:52
across the aisle and find common ground
5:55
and there is common common ground out
5:57
there one of the things that encourages
5:59
me great is the young people right now
6:02
uh the extent to which they have
6:03
gravitated to Dr Ron Paul's message that
6:06
is a hope for all of us that's so people
6:09
that say that the American people are
6:11
tuned out they're not interested in
6:13
complex ideas about fiat currency and
6:16
Tom selus is here uh and they're not
6:18
interested in these things and they they
6:19
don't want to pay attention well I
6:21
submit to you that the the the huge body
6:24
of young people that have gravitated to
6:25
Dr Paul's me message of Sanity economic
6:28
sanity and truth should give us all hope
6:31
and we have to start encouraging more of
6:32
that and not disdaining other people who
6:34
may have seized upon a different issue
6:36
that we don't feel is so important
6:38
there's a lot of heads to the tentacular
6:41
Beast out there and and and we all pick
6:44
one or two hopefully that we can make a
6:45
difference in um so this government
6:48
misconduct issue is an important deal um
6:51
and what we've been doing through Foya
6:53
in criminal cases is obtaining evidence
6:55
of Discovery violations subornation of
6:57
perjury and a whole manner of of other
6:59
misconduct and recently we were really
7:02
happy it's a wonderful family out of
7:03
Atlanta Georgia the marshala family and
7:06
I'm not going to get into the details of
7:08
the case but should
7:10
I oh jeez you're
7:13
corrected all right my my lawyer told me
7:16
to do something I better listen uh all
7:20
right I'll give you a synopsis of this
7:21
case and this is what's one of the one
7:23
of the things that's wrong when you know
7:25
and and I'll tell you something there's
7:26
plenty of good government servants out
7:28
there we need highquality men and women
7:29
in government service there's bad people
7:31
out there that need to be investigated
7:33
and disciplined for a fraud and all
7:35
violence and all manner of things and we
7:37
don't want ourselves broad brushed uh as
7:40
people who don't believe in discipline
7:42
Law and Order because I do now I'm a
7:44
Libertarian all right I believe in
7:45
individual rights and Liberty but I also
7:47
believe in objective morality and I
7:50
believe that we have to have a
7:51
disciplined society and many times we're
7:53
all broad brushed as being some sort of
7:55
anarchists you know because uh some of
7:58
us have conventional beliefs regarding
8:00
the scope and nature of tax and we have
8:02
to resist that we have to talk to people
8:04
about other issues as well um the
8:07
marshala case is an object example of
8:10
what's wrong with how the federal
8:12
special agents are trained how our
8:15
United States attorneys and the
8:16
assistant us attorneys are trained and
8:18
and how doj tax division runs their shop
8:22
Nazis I'm sorry na well you know it it
8:27
has it's become it's become so personal
8:29
and and unhinged from rule of law due
8:32
process principles it's an Abomination
8:35
so you have a female special agent down
8:37
in Atlanta Georgia back in
8:39
1999 Patricia L
8:41
Bergstrom and she sees this circle
8:44
company start growing and building a lot
8:46
of the they hang they hang rock
8:48
everybody know what rock hanging is
8:49
drywall it's called Rock hanging they're
8:51
big drywall company and Jerry's broke he
8:54
moves down with his family from New York
8:56
City yes his last name has an extra vow
8:58
back there he is Italian uh and and so
9:01
he moves down there and he starts his
9:03
company from scratch they have nothing
9:04
and he gets a rock contract to build the
9:06
Olympics and he assists in building the
9:08
Olympic Village he becomes successful
9:10
and he's not a non-filer Jerry marshala
9:12
files his tax returns and pays tax and
9:15
by our account he's paid a whole bunch
9:18
of tax over the past 12 years supporting
9:21
sub Clans somewhere in the world I don't
9:22
know where um but it's a lot of tax but
9:26
he was Italian uh he was from New York
9:28
City uh and he liked to wear a nice suit
9:30
every once in a while that apparently
9:32
made him John GTI Jr and special agent
9:34
Bergstrom set about to with a
9:37
persecution that's hard to grasp the
9:39
scope of it starts in 1999 she believes
9:42
he's some mafiosi from New York she
9:45
starts investigating him for uh money
9:47
laundering and currency transaction
9:49
report violations she uh commits fraud
9:52
and causes uh a seizure of some checks
9:56
in the FedEx terminal in FedEx in
9:58
Memphis tendency to be seized uses that
10:01
as a pretext to start an organized crime
10:03
LCN investigation and this goes on for
10:06
12 years uh Jerry marshala Jr my lead
10:09
client is is as I was mentioning over
10:11
lunch has to be the most investigated
10:13
man in the
10:14
world uh and I'll get back to that so
10:17
the Marshal ett is what do they do you
10:18
know they're law-abiding people they
10:21
talk to some of their business lawyers
10:23
guys that do contracts for them uh and
10:25
they hire the best former prosecutors
10:28
you know they can get in Atlanta larious
10:30
laughing I mean this is this is what's
10:32
this is what rational people do right
10:34
you know I'm following my returns I'm
10:36
paying tax uh I talked to my business
10:38
lawyer he says oh there's these guys
10:40
over here at this white shoe Silk
10:41
Stocking firm over there and they've got
10:43
a couple of former prosecutors they're
10:45
going to give you a great defense um so
10:47
this goes into 2002 they have to hire
10:49
criminal tax counsel and they do former
10:51
prosecutors from Atlanta Georgia the
10:52
best in the business down there uh well
10:55
they immediately start to sense that
10:56
something's wrong so the investigation
10:58
goes on and on and on ultimately in 2007
11:01
in March they're indicted by a Federal
11:03
grand jury um their lawyers tell them
11:05
it's a slam dunk they didn't do anything
11:07
wrong they're innocent they're going to
11:08
be acquitted by the jury and how lawyers
11:10
can tell clients that given the jury
11:12
system we have I don't know but that's
11:14
what they were told and they were
11:16
confident they they didn't know about
11:17
the system they were confident that they
11:19
were going to be acquitted well they
11:21
went to trial and they were convicted in
11:22
September
11:23
2007 um I was lead trial counsel for uh
11:27
Wesley Snipes and in the case down in
11:29
Florida in 2008 we' gotten the jury
11:32
verdict February 1st 2008 and they were
11:35
looking for help because they were
11:36
facing sentencing um and so they called
11:39
me up the father Mr marshalla called me
11:41
up um and his daughter called me they
11:43
were very worried about their family of
11:45
course because uh Jerry Jr was facing
11:47
seven eight years in federal prison and
11:49
the father who was in his early 70s at
11:51
the time is facing five or six years in
11:53
prison so we were engaged for a
11:55
sentencing consult and appeal so the
11:58
first thing we did is we consulted with
12:00
the local lawyers on sentencing and we
12:03
got them a bail pending appeal the judge
12:06
had made a crucial Reliance on on on
12:08
accountant or Tax Advisor jury
12:10
instruction mistake crucially important
12:12
that's a conventional mistake judges can
12:14
make those mistakes so we had a great
12:16
appeal issue and the judge had integrity
12:18
and he let them out on their own
12:20
recognizance pending the appeal so at
12:22
least their business wouldn't be
12:23
destroyed and their family wouldn't be
12:24
destroyed then we started reading the
12:25
trial transcripts getting ready for what
12:27
we call the merits appeal we're going to
12:29
appeal these convictions to the US court
12:31
of appeals for the 11th circuit and my
12:33
team and I started seeing what we call
12:35
India of
12:37
misconduct we looked at the discovery
12:39
15,000 pages of Discovery in a massive
12:42
client tax conspiracy evasion false
12:44
subscription case that was going on for
12:46
12 years that's just not possible and
12:49
then we saw evidence that there was
12:50
subornation of perjury when you read a
12:52
trial transcript and and you read a lot
12:54
of them you can get a pretty good whiff
12:56
when a witness is lying here America
12:59
here in
13:01
America the trial was so bad and then
13:03
the the government prosecutors there was
13:05
an older Italian man who worked uh as a
13:07
Rockman for Jerry and he was a first
13:10
generation immigrant he had a very thick
13:12
Italian accent uh the prosecutor Justin
13:14
anad actually approached him on a a a a
13:18
direct examination and asked him a
13:20
couple questions and everybody could
13:21
hear he had a thick he he was in his
13:23
late 70s he had a thick Italian accent
13:26
and he says um uh where are you from you
13:29
know are you from are you are you
13:31
Italian and he said I am an American I'm
13:35
an American citizen that's the sort of
13:36
crap these prosecutors started right off
13:38
with the jury as if these were some sort
13:40
of mobsters because they had a Italian
13:42
immigrant who was working Hanging Rock
13:43
for him and it got worse they Savaged
13:46
them uh with talk of mansions that
13:48
didn't exist uh it was it was the most
13:51
unprofessional misconduct opening
13:53
statement I've ever seen and not one
13:55
objection from the defense attorneys not
13:58
one
13:59
so the trial rolled out the government
14:01
also pulled out a confidential informant
14:03
and increasingly this is also used in
14:05
all manner of cases not just criminal
14:07
tax um and you could read that trial
14:10
transcript and know this guy was lying
14:11
that that that Sean McBride that
14:13
confidential informant who's no longer
14:14
very confidential because I know his
14:16
name because we investigated him uh he
14:19
was actually a controlled paid FBI
14:22
informant managed and controlled by
14:24
Atlanta based FBI Special Agent Mark Su
14:27
and they lied to the court about that
14:29
they lied to the defense lawyers and
14:31
that did not reveal that he was a paid
14:33
confidential controlled informant so
14:34
he's going to say anything they want to
14:36
up there and he did he lied about
14:38
babysitting Jerry and Sandy marshalled
14:40
his kids Sandy told me later I wouldn't
14:43
I I I met that buffoon once and I would
14:46
never I wouldn't have that oath babysit
14:48
my children in a million years this is a
14:49
solid family uh so it just went from bad
14:52
to worse closing argument was a
14:54
nightmare uh so we read this and so I
14:56
went to the Marshal ettes and I said you
14:58
should authorize me to do a as conduct
15:00
investigation because I think he had
15:02
massive Discovery violations and there's
15:04
something going on behind this case
15:06
there's no way this case just Springs
15:07
out of nowhere as a criminal tax case
15:09
there's something behind here there's a
15:11
story behind the story now I'll compress
15:15
the story a little bit so we started
15:17
investigating uh we had an investigator
15:19
and US conducted interviews we tracked
15:21
down all of the witnesses and reined
15:23
them and lo and behold the stuff that
15:25
was in the memoranda of interview that
15:27
the government the IRS special agent put
15:29
down was never said there was loads of
15:32
exculpatory statements made to the
15:34
government that have to be revealed to
15:35
the defense that was not this wasn't an
15:38
unfair trial this was a fraud a fraud of
15:42
Epic
15:43
Proportion uh so when they say well you
15:45
know we can go after the non-filers but
15:47
you know we won't break the rules
15:48
regarding anybody else that's a ball
15:50
face lie every American should know that
15:53
this can happen to them because it can
15:54
happen to the Marshal edes down in
15:55
Atlanta it can happen to them that's a
15:57
message we can talk to people about just
15:59
because people don't agree with an
16:01
unconventional view regarding the scope
16:02
and nature of tax does not mean that
16:05
they should not be concerned what's
16:06
going on in the federal agent Special
16:08
Agent Cadre with our government in
16:10
Washington DC with doj tax division and
16:12
with the US attorney's offices because
16:14
they should be they better be concerned
16:16
if they care about themselves their
16:17
children's their children and their
16:19
future uh so we did a bunch of Freedom
16:21
of Information Act requests and lo and
16:22
behold again Jerry Marshal is the most
16:24
investigated man in the world there was
16:26
an execution of a search warrant on
16:28
alleged conspirator that was not
16:29
revealed to the defense prior to trial
16:31
in violation of the statutes and
16:33
Constitution laws of the United States
16:34
as Larry knows and other people know in
16:37
here uh and uh there was 17 federal
16:40
agencies that participated in that rate
16:43
17 now I'm pretty good at my alphabet
16:45
soup you know my alphabet soup directory
16:47
the acronyms five or six of them I
16:49
didn't even know what they were
16:51
including AOS which we learned was the
16:53
office of Air Force Special
16:55
investigations no kidding the off air
16:57
Air Force office of special
16:59
investigations a fosi they had everybody
17:02
there I mean You' have thought they were
17:04
going after Osama Bin Laden oh and by
17:06
the way the confidential informant to
17:07
Jin up the investigation and make more
17:10
money he actually told the government
17:11
the special agents that Jerry knew Osama
17:14
Bin Laden personally and was affiliated
17:16
with the Osama Bin Laden construction
17:18
company I'm not kidding you now if
17:20
you're a special agent Hey Joe what do
17:21
you think about that if somebody came up
17:23
to you and said hey this guy he's a
17:24
personal friend of Osama bin Laden I
17:26
mean what would you think about that the
17:27
guy's not
17:29
slightly not slightly incredible right
17:32
oh no they put it they put it in their
17:35
uh form 9131 Joe put it right in there
17:39
right in the 9131 so Jerry marshala was
17:42
a bad man um so we started figuring out
17:45
what was going on and she used the uh
17:47
what we call the uh Italian uh ethnic
17:50
Prejudice Whispering campaign she told
17:52
everybody and anybody that she talked to
17:54
in the FBI at the US attorney's office
17:56
at doj tax division that these were LCN
17:59
laosa ostra organized crime people and
18:02
that's how she kept all these people
18:04
interested in what she was doing uh so
18:07
we started to find this all out through
18:08
Foya because the government wouldn't
18:10
give us any more documents than were
18:12
produced before trial and Discovery and
18:14
so we foyer all of these agencies and
18:16
and the hundreds of thousands of pages
18:19
started to Pile in without exaggeration
18:22
hundreds of thousands of pages that told
18:25
the true story of the fraud that special
18:27
agent berst had perpetrated I'm going to
18:30
fast forward to the appeal I argued the
18:32
appeal at the 11 circuit in Atlanta for
18:34
them uh August 18th
18:37
2010 it was a very good oral argument
18:40
you know you're and this doesn't happen
18:41
for lawyers who are representing
18:43
controversial causes I I get abused from
18:45
the judges you know I mean I you know
18:48
you're doing pretty well uh when one of
18:50
the judges on the three-judge panel
18:52
interrupts the government lawyer who
18:53
tried the
18:54
case 15 seconds into the government's
18:57
lawyer's uh presentation on appeal he
18:59
interrupts him and he says uh Mr before
19:02
you get going um hold on one second I
19:05
just want to let you know that my
19:06
colleagues and I we're deeply troubled
19:08
by your case now
19:12
continue you know you're doing pretty
19:14
good and we're like what happened here
19:17
we we and then after a couple more
19:19
minutes he interrupts him he goes Mr
19:21
Anan I got a question for you we going
19:24
to put people in federal prison for this
19:27
really so you know it was one of those
19:30
um they smelled it so you you know there
19:32
there's there's good people and bad
19:34
people in all walks of life I've been in
19:35
front of extremely good federal judges
19:38
and I've been in front of horrible
19:40
federal judges who disgrace the office
19:43
but there's there's a spectrum as there
19:45
is in life uh these were some pretty
19:47
good judges up there on that panel and
19:49
they sniffed a rat even though we
19:51
couldn't raise any of this misconduct
19:52
stuff on appeal you have to go on the
19:54
record we just went after the jury
19:56
instruction and the government
19:57
misconduct in opening statement and
19:59
closing argument which we argued
20:01
aggressively uh so we got the decision
20:03
the first decision came down uh actually
20:05
argu in 2009 I'm sorry in August of 2009
20:09
August of
20:10
2010 the panel came in and reversed all
20:13
of the counts of conviction save one the
20:17
count one Klein tax
20:19
conspiracy so although it was great to
20:21
get it all those counts reversed but
20:24
with the count one Klein conspiracy
20:26
still remaining unreversed they face
20:28
their sentencing risk they still had the
20:30
same sentencing exposure as if none of
20:32
the counts had been reversed it was a
20:34
good day but it was not a great day by
20:36
any stretch so we filed a petition for
20:38
panel rehearing to try and compel that
20:41
three judge panel to
20:43
reconsider whether the failures that we
20:46
documented in the original appeal also
20:48
required reversal of that last remaining
20:50
count uh they don't Grant many of them
20:52
they granted this one they ordered
20:54
additional briefing and on uh December
20:56
22nd of 2010 and they reversed the last
20:59
count so now the Slate was wiped clean
21:01
the Marshal lettas were not facing any
21:03
sentencing risk whatsoever and I got to
21:05
call uh Jerry Joyce and his father uh
21:08
when they were having their company
21:09
Christmas party on the
21:11
22nd um I need that s excuse me thank
21:14
you so that was a good day so we figured
21:18
um I I had some guys working with me
21:20
investigators on the case and we figure
21:22
there's no way the government's going to
21:23
retry because they get to retry those
21:25
counts right not withstanding the fact
21:27
that the 11 Circ wipes the Slate clean
21:29
the government gets an opportunity to
21:30
decide whether they're going to retry
21:32
and with all the dirt that we had
21:34
documented in court including a 1500
21:37
page uh motion to dismiss for misconduct
21:40
the evidence all the we took all the
21:42
documents we got from Foya and we said
21:44
this is where special agent Bergstrom
21:45
committed perjury highlighted it I mean
21:48
1500 pages of exhibits and filings we
21:50
figured there was no way the
21:51
government's going to retry but they did
21:53
and they announced their intention to
21:55
retry them on the entire case again and
21:57
this
21:58
shows how careerism and advancement and
22:03
ego and narcissism narcissism are
22:06
running uh the show and calling the
22:07
shots in many of these situations we
22:10
were shocked so we we figured well we'll
22:14
blow the thing up and we'll file another
22:16
motion to dismiss for government
22:18
misconduct because we were learning
22:19
every month we would get more of these
22:21
foyer disclosures and putting the
22:22
picture together and so we did we filed
22:24
one government was so the government
22:26
comes to me and says well and by the way
22:28
the Marshall have authorized me to talk
22:29
publicly about every intimate detail
22:32
about this case so you're aware they
22:34
want people to know what's going
22:37
on
22:40
um so the government came to me and said
22:42
well we won't retried it if Jerry if
22:45
they all plead if they all plead to a
22:47
top count
22:48
felony and Jerry does 18 months so old
22:52
man does 6 months and the bookkeeper
22:54
gets probation and uh my clients weren't
22:57
going to do that that so I said no
22:58
that's not going to work then we filed
23:00
our motion to dismiss government comes
23:01
back 3 four months later well we've
23:03
given it some consideration and if they
23:05
all do a top count felony then we'll
23:07
give them probation so now we're not
23:09
interested in that you you guys want to
23:10
retry the case we're ready for you and
23:12
we're going to go for an evidentiary
23:13
hearing on Miss conduct try and get this
23:14
case dismissed and uh this goes back and
23:17
forth I finally had a meeting with the
23:18
entire Command Staff of the US
23:20
attorney's office Northern disc of
23:21
Georgia and they sent a doj tax division
23:23
lawyer down there to monitor them
23:25
because they had a bad wh because I
23:26
called some people at doj Christopher
23:28
maetta you might have bumped into him
23:30
Larry uh and then things started to turn
23:33
a little bit so then they came in and
23:34
said okay fine we'll plead them all out
23:37
to misdemeanors we'll give you
23:38
misdemeanors if if you don't expose all
23:40
this and file that last motion you're
23:42
going to file uh and everybody gets
23:44
probation misdemeanors in probation on
23:46
most criminal defense attorneys that's a
23:48
dog on good deal because they risk going
23:50
six seven years in federal prison that's
23:52
not a joke and the old man would have
23:54
probably died in federal prison at that
23:56
rate my clients rejected it so we filed
23:59
our last motion to dismiss for
24:01
government misconduct I argued it in
24:03
August um and uh September 10th we had a
24:06
final hearing and ultimately uh the
24:09
judge dismissed all the charges against
24:10
jury with prejudice um the old man just
24:14
to fall on the sword took a
24:16
misdemeanor and and no sentence the
24:19
father took a misdemeanor paid a $25
24:22
fine as he walked out of court and no
24:24
probation no supervised release but
24:25
Jerry was dismissed with prejudice and
24:28
walked out of court of free man so um
24:31
that's why I wanted to wind it up with
24:32
that it's important that we talk to
24:34
people about the things that are going
24:35
on out there and not just talking about
24:37
the principal issue that we may care
24:38
about connecting with people out in the
24:40
community and getting them to be
24:42
interested in uh good government account
24:45
accountable transparent government and
24:48
there's ways that we all can do that
24:51
um yes sir uh Bob glad to have you in
24:54
Austin now where unfortunately the
24:57
judges are not
24:59
good uh but uh do we have a website for
25:03
the marshmallo case and others like it
25:05
yeah we we've been mad busy uh it took
25:08
so much time out of us over the past
25:09
couple years on that case we devoted
25:11
everything we had to it um there's some
25:13
reference on my website to the Marshall
25:15
Ed case we're putting up all the filings
25:17
all the documents the transcript of my
25:19
most recent oral argument in August uh
25:21
give me two or 3 weeks uh the website
25:23
for The Firm is bernhoft
25:25
law.com sure it's b n h
25:32
ft law.com all lower Cas so bernhoft
25:37
law.com
25:39
and um you go to our website we're over
25:42
on 12th in Colorado um and we'll talk to
25:45
anybody about any problems they got you
25:47
got an issue you want to talk about is
25:49
uh give a call over to the office
25:50
Bethany will answer the phone uh she'll
25:52
set it up and uh be happy to talk to
25:54
anybody yes sir and have you joined the
25:56
Federalist Society we have a very strong
25:58
chapter here of like-minded lawyers um
26:01
you know I used to be a student member
26:03
of the of the federal Society in law
26:04
school but I it's a good I was talking
26:06
to Steve and I've lost track of all my
26:08
newsletters like Franklin Sanders the
26:10
money changer FES so we're going to be
26:13
resubscribing and I'll take you up on
26:14
the federal Society membership because
26:15
I'm very sympathetic to that that type
26:18
of legal analysis and judicial uh
26:21
thinking well in particular our local
26:23
chapter is very strong excellent thank
26:26
you very much yes sir silly question but
26:29
there
26:30
any chance of uh bringing a lawsuit
26:33
against Bergstrom for misconduct perjury
26:37
and all great question real quick answer
26:40
uh the Marshal has got justice but it
26:42
wasn't perfect Justice and everybody's
26:45
chafing about this should be a great day
26:47
Jerry walk set a a court of free man uh
26:50
but they were required to wave uh any
26:53
feral federal civil rights cause of
26:55
action in The Bargain uh and that was
26:57
part of the deal where the judge
26:58
dismissed all the charges with prejudice
27:00
against Jerry and without that he he's
27:02
he's a construction guy so he's got to
27:04
get bonding and insurance even a
27:06
misdemeanor destroys his business so
27:08
they were forced to make very very
27:10
difficult and believe me we had a wamp
27:11
them federal civil rights
27:13
suit uh but I understand from certain
27:16
people I've spoken to in government that
27:17
all will not be well with special agent
27:19
Bergstrom what about a criminal
27:22
complaint yeah uh We've waved all of our
27:25
causes of action on that but I
27:26
understand that take is doing its own
27:28
investigation treasury inspector for tax
27:31
administration it's not perfect Justice
27:33
folks uh it's hard to come by and um but
27:36
these people but anybody can file a
27:38
criminal complaint well that's true so
27:41
uh in several weeks you know when
27:42
everything goes up on the website if
27:44
some right thinking individuals want to
27:45
pursue a course of action who am I to
27:49
say thank
27:52
you thank you very much thank you thanks
27:55
Bob
#Government
#Law & Government
#Legal
#Legal Services